Issac Lee Wells v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued August 31, 2018
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-18-00558-CR
    ———————————
    ISSAC LEE WELLS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 119th District Court
    Tom Green County, Texas
    Trial Court Case No. B-17-0698-SB
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from a conviction for two counts of harassment
    of a public servant. The trial court imposed appellant’s sentence on February 27,
    2018. The trial court certified that this was not a plea-bargain case and that appellant
    had the right to appeal. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on March 16,
    2018, but he did not file a notice of appeal until June 14, 2018. This was too late.
    In criminal cases in which a party timely files a motion for new trial, the
    appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 90 days after the day sentence is
    imposed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Thus, the deadline for filing the notice of
    appeal here was May 29, 2018. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 14, 2018.
    Thus, his notice of appeal was not timely filed. Without a timely-filed notice of
    appeal, we lack jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 523 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1996).
    Rule 26.3 permits an appellate court to extend the time to file the notice of
    appeal if appellant files a motion for extension of time within 15 days of the deadline
    for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Although appellant stated
    that he intended to file a motion for extension of time, this record contains no such
    motion, and no motion for extension may be implied in criminal cases. See Lair v.
    State, 
    321 S.W.3d 158
    , 159 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d) (citing
    
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523
    ).
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
    pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.
    2
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-18-00558-CR

Filed Date: 8/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/1/2018