Roshunda Lago v. Harris County, Texas ( 2017 )

Opinion issued May 4, 2017
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-17-00103-CV
———————————
ROSHUNDA LAGO, Appellant
V.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1078421
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Roshunda Lago appeals from a judgment signed January 6, 2017. Lago has
neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate
costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207,
51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court,
in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-
District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. After being notified that this appeal
was subject to dismissal, Lago did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5
(allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
2