Swift Energy Operating, LLC v. Regency Field Services LLC, Regency Energy Partners LP, Regency GP LP, and Regency GP LLC. ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    December 4, 2017
    No. 04-17-00638-CV
    SWIFT ENERGY OPERATING, LLC,
    Appellant
    v.
    REGENCY FIELD SERVICES LLC, Regency Energy Partners LP, Regency GP LP, and
    Regency GP LLC,
    Appellees
    From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas
    Trial Court No. M-14-0029-CV-C
    Honorable Janna K. Whatley, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In its third amended petition in intervention, Swift Energy Operating, LLC, alleged
    claims of trespass, negligence, gross negligence, and nuisance against Regency Field Services
    LLC, Regency Energy Partners LP, Regency GP LP, and Regency GP LLC (collectively,
    Regency). Regency filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Swift Energy’s claims
    should be dismissed based on the statute of limitations. On June 28, 2017, the trial court granted
    Regency’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment against Swift Energy on limitations
    grounds. Swift Energy then filed a notice of appeal, stating that it intends to appeal from the trial
    court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Regency.
    A judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all pending
    parties and claims before the court. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex.
    2001). Here, the trial court’s order of June 28, 2017, is interlocutory because it does not dispose
    of all parties and causes of action. Thus, it is not a final and appealable order. Interlocutory
    orders may be appealed only if a specific statute authorizes such an interlocutory appeal. For
    example, section 51.014 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code lists circumstances
    under which a person may appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court, county court at
    law, or county court. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. ' 51.014. We cannot, however,
    find any statutory authority allowing an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in this
    situation.
    We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by December 19, 2017 why
    this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines
    pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.
    _________________________________
    Irene Rios, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 4th day of December, 2017.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-17-00638-CV

Filed Date: 12/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/6/2017