Jane Doe and John Doe v. Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC Philip K. Broderick, Individually Andres A. Arguello, Individually Samantha Fenwich, Individually Schavon J. Jahn And Albert Zavala ( 2017 )

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-17-00683-CV
Jane Doe and John Doe, Appellants
v.
Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC; Philip K. Broderick, Individually;
Andres A. Arguello, Individually; Samantha Fenwich, Individually; Schavon J. Jahn;
and Albert Zavala, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 433RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. C2017-0422D, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 1, 2017, we informed appellants that it appeared from the clerk’s
record that they were attempting to appeal from an interlocutory order that was not immediately
appealable under statute. We requested a response explaining how we might exercise jurisdiction
over the appeal no later than November 17. To date, appellants have not responded to our letter.
We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also id.
R. 42.3(c) (court of appeals may dismiss if appellant does not comply with notice from clerk
requiring response within certain time).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 5, 2017
2