Eric Samuel Tucker v. State ( 2015 )

FILED IN
1STCOURT OFAPPEALS
HC..U?.-:0?.« TEXAS
JU* - 8 2015
. CHhiSTOPHjfl
CHhiSTOPMlfl A. PRINE
^ Cc^ STiT^TiaKlM. F.RJlog 3 Cfrf^ciAiJ t
^jr S^KTUTdrU/ VlTQt-AT-xahl J PfJ^L^Q]&_AJ1&L"
*JLiM£XkBL£LJto^
^XiSiifSS"
er-c
^ H^vfkurr> 5gKRr v\ ; QYF^\^n\c£,o_cR^xG_foaG,i-Hix<^a&
JSQ-UIXEO Cohf-CLO"DKl
— - - > >>
>» c
D 0
O "O
a> 0
*•» **
CO «
fH3SW 1-
0
c
I-
0>
c
G5"MJ NWv.,Ty 77735 ©
0 O
a>
Hf 31 -H^T
i'TOOSSOBSSS l»l l-ni-'ilii-ilhiMHPiHIilillill'Piili'iiMllnW
FILEDIN
!ST COURT OF APPEALS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
jUN 1 0 2015
CHRiST0PHBfSAP5iNE CADSE N0- 01-14-00109-CV
CLfflHC YtATT riV TEXAS § IN ffHE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
V. § AT HOUSTON, TEXAS
JEFFREY STEVEN MARX § CAUSE NO. 01-14-00109-CV
$ TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 7723.
MOTION TO CONSCRUE THIS BRIEF IN THE LIGHT OF
HAINES V. KERNER// 92 S. Ct. 594 SUPREME COURT CASE.
NOW COME, JEFFREY STEVEN MARX TDCJ-ID NO. 716623/ AND WOULD REQUEST
THIS FIRST COURT OF APPEALS CONSRCUE THIS BRIEF IN THE LIGHT OF HAINES V.
KERNER/ 92 s.cT. 594 AND WOULD SHOW THE FOLLOWING;
I.
That Appellant is not skilled at Law or the Drafting of wirts and is
not an attorney and should be entitled to review under less stringent standards
of those performed by a skilled attorney and in HAINES V. KERNER/ 92 S.CT. 594
the Supreme Court of the UNITED STATES rule this to be so and stated it should
be the case for all who ar filing in the Courts and so Appellant would request
that this Honorable First Court of Appeals give him the same consideration.
II.
THIS IS THE SECOND TIME HE HAS FILED THIS WRIT.
OnApril 29/ 2015 Appellant sent this Honorable Court of Appeals this
his writand the Court should have recieved this writ and should have let
Appellant know but has failed to do so and now he is typing it once more
and hopes this time the First Court will give him notice they recieved this
brief and have the Clerk send him notice that the brief has been filed and
recieved.
Appellant sent Mr. Wiley B. McAfee Jr. a copy and has not heard from
him either but does not have the supplies to keep doing this and would also
request this Honorable Court have the Clerk send a Copy to him for him because
he does not have the supplies and TDCJ will not give him what he needs to
make the copies required to give more than one copy.
-1-
June 04/ 2015.
FILED IN
TO: THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
'ST COURT OF APPEALS
ATT: MR. CHRISTOPHER A- PRINE CLERK. HOUSTON, TEXAS
301 Fannin Street M 1 0 20/5
Houston/ Texas 77002-2066 CHRISTOPHER a.|PR,NE
3LERK
\ - l\ A-
RE: Case No. 0I-L4-00109-CV Motion to be filed and another copy of brief.
Greetings Mr. Prine;
I am sending this retyped copy of the first brief that I sent to you
to have you file with the Court out/ it seems you did not recieve it so I
have made a typed copy of the first one I sent to your office and this time
I hope you get this one and I would request that you please file this motion
for me if you would please sir.
I would also request that you send me a copy of the Deeket sheet the
latestes one that is so I can see were the case is at this time and would
once again request confermation you recieved this Brief and motion and have
filed it.
I thank you for your time and efforts inadvance Mr. Prine have a good
day sir.
I would also request that you send Casie Walker a Copy of this Brief
and Motion and request she serve a copy on Mr. Wiley B- McAfee as well please
sa sir.
&*/f/Pe»llte/t s_ request
^/ U){>/) m- J^Wey/Marx #716623.
Pit&SP 0»,)a', ESTELLE HIGH SECURITY UNIT.
264 FM 3478 RD.
Huntsviile, Texas 77320
FILED IN
IST COURT OFAPPEALS
K-U.:?':c-f4 TEXAS
JUW - 8 2015
CHhiSTOPyi!^ A^PRINE
CLEF;
bvfcTbTftS Followkic CSte^s I Qj-IS^flQffN-qL-
*>4*(*yi*«*!3<
ffiJ ASTMbbS LSS^majvLSsJL"^ fefcJlX.
) jg£r out XESrXMMxg^ __
*JLUA£X«UBJJEL"
^i!JJSu££rS5£^X &h3&£ cj$_jjdiEfi&J^txj_^:jidocEda^
ere
JSQ-UlJ^-p^JIO^CLU"Ki-
SiX^F CF M SQtiXTAL, RMgjE£ To A,
> >>
ifl
ifl
O
CM
CM
O
O
P-