in Re Elizabeth Benavidez Elite Aviation, Inc. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                 Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-19-00283-CV
    IN RE ELIZABETH BENAVIDEZ ELITE AVIATION, INC.
    Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Irene Rios, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2019
    PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
    In this original proceeding, relator asks this court to compel the trial court to grant its no-
    evidence motion for summary judgment, which it filed on March 4, 2019. We deny the petition
    for writ of mandamus.
    DISCUSSION
    Upon the filing of a no-evidence motion for summary judgment, “[t]he court must grant
    the motion unless the respondent produces summary judgment evidence raising a genuine issue of
    material fact.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 166a(i). Because the real party in interest did not respond to
    relator’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment, relator asserts the trial court had no discretion
    1
    This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CVK002669-D3, styled Laredo Jet Center, LLC v. City of Laredo, et
    al., pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo
    presiding.
    04-19-00283-CV
    to refuse to grant its motion, and this court has the authority to issue a writ directing the trial court
    to grant the motion.
    Although Rule 166a(i) plainly states that the motion “must” be granted absent a proper
    response, we do not have the authority by mandamus to require the trial court to grant relator’s
    pending motion. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals, 
    362 S.W.2d 101
    , 104-05 (Tex. 1962) (orig.
    proceeding) (appellate court “may not tell the district court what judgment to enter”); In re Mission
    Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 
    990 S.W.2d 459
    , 460 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999, orig.
    proceeding) (“we do not have the authority by mandamus . . . to require the trial court to grant the
    present ‘no evidence’ motion for summary judgment”). Therefore, we deny relator’s petition for
    writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00283-CV

Filed Date: 5/15/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/16/2019