David Middleman v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-17-00359-CR
    DAVID MIDDLEMAN                                                     APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                       STATE
    ----------
    FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
    TRIAL COURT NO. F16-2710-431
    ----------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    ----------
    After receiving Appellant’s Counsel’s “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for
    Appellant,” we abated this appeal and remanded this case to the trial court for a
    hearing to determine whether Appellant wished to continue this appeal. Two
    days before the hearing, Appellant’s counsel filed with this court a motion to
    dismiss Appellant’s appeal, but the motion did not comply with rule 42.2(a)
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    because it included limitations beside Appellant’s signature.2 See Tex. R. App.
    P. 42.2(a). Two days later at the abatement hearing, the trial court noted that it
    had received Appellant’s handwritten motion to withdraw his appeal.3 The trial
    court confirmed that Appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.
    Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an
    appeal may be dismissed if an appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal
    signed by both the appellant and his attorney. See 
    id. The purpose
    of that
    requirement is to protect an appellant from having his appeal dismissed by
    counsel without his consent and to ensure that counsel had notice of the motion
    in order to advise the client on the consequences of a dismissal. Conners v.
    State, 
    966 S.W.2d 108
    , 110 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d); see
    Jones v. State, No. 07-15-00371-CR, 
    2016 WL 902960
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—
    Amarillo Mar. 7, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
    Moreover, the decision of whether to take an appeal from a criminal conviction is
    personal to the accused.    See 
    Conners, 966 S.W.2d at 110
    (citing Jones v.
    Barnes, 
    463 U.S. 745
    , 751, 
    103 S. Ct. 3308
    , 3312 (1983)).
    Based on the record before us, and no decision of this court having been
    delivered, we dismiss this appeal at Appellant’s request and dismiss counsel’s
    2
    After Appellant’s signature, the following appears: “without recourse all
    rights reserved.”
    3
    Appellant’s handwritten motion to withdraw his appeal appears in the
    supplemental clerk’s record that was filed in this court after the abatement
    hearing.
    2
    motion to withdraw as moot.    See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Jones, 
    2016 WL 902960
    , at *1; see also Terry v. State, No. 03-14-00555-CR, 
    2016 WL 4506154
    ,
    at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 25, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
    publication) (dismissing appeal at appellant’s request and dismissing counsel’s
    motion to withdraw as moot).
    /s/ Sue Walker
    SUE WALKER
    JUSTICE
    PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: June 21, 2018
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-17-00359-CR

Filed Date: 6/21/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/25/2018