Carter Cole Bomer v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-22-00024-CR
    Carter Cole Bomer, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
    NO. CR2017-806, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Carter Cole Bomer was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder and
    sentenced by the trial court to fifty years’ confinement. See Tex. Penal Code. § 19.02(c).
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
    a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.          The brief meets the
    requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
    demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744 (1967);
    Garner v. State, 
    300 S.W.3d 763
    , 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
    
    488 U.S. 75
    , 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of
    the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record
    and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See
    Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
    , 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 
    386 U.S. at 744
    . Appellant filed a pro se response on December 21, 2022.
    We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of
    the trial and sentencing proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se
    response—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 
    386 U.S. at 744
    ; Garner, 
    300 S.W.3d at 766
    ; Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel
    that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 1        The trial court’s judgment of
    conviction is affirmed.
    __________________________________________
    Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice
    Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Theofanis
    Affirmed
    Filed: February 8, 2023
    Do Not Publish
    1   In addition, all other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-22-00024-CR

Filed Date: 2/8/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/14/2023