William Robert Williams v. Robin Marlene Williams ( 2016 )

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00341-CV
WILLIAM ROBERT WILLIAMS APPELLANT
V.
ROBIN MARLENE WILLIAMS APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 324-569317-15
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
----------
Appellant William Robert Williams, proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal
from the trial court’s September 28, 2015 final decree of divorce. On October 26,
2015, appellant filed a timely motion for extension of time to file his notice of
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3. We granted the motion and ordered
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
appellant to file his notice of appeal in the trial court on or before December 14,
2015.
On December 14, 2015, appellant filed a second motion for extension of
time to file his notice of appeal. We concluded that appellant’s second motion for
extension represented a good faith attempt to perfect his appeal within the time
as extended by his first motion for extension, and therefore, appellant’s second
motion for extension represented a bona fide attempt to invoke this court’s
jurisdiction. See Sweed v. Nye, 323 S.W.3d 873, 875 (Tex. 2010). Thus, on
December 22, 2015, we directed appellant to file in the trial court an amended
notice of appeal that complied with the requirements of rule 25.1(d) on or before
January 21, 2016, and to file with this court a copy of the amended notice of
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d), (g), 37.1. We further stated that the appeal
could be dismissed if appellant failed to comply with our order. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.3, 43.2(f).
Appellant was incarcerated in the Lindsey Unit in Jacksboro, Texas, at the
time he filed his motions for extension, and he stated in both motions that he was
to be released on January 1, 2016. We sent our December 22, 2015 order
directing him to file an amended notice of appeal to appellant’s Lindsey Unit
address by mail. The order was returned to us as undeliverable, and the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice verified that appellant was no longer
incarcerated.
2
Appellant has not provided us with a forwarding mailing address. Cf. Tex.
R. App. P. 9.1(b) (requiring unrepresented party to provide party’s mailing
address on all documents filed with the court). We contacted appellant’s
probation officer, who provided us with appellant’s address. On March 2, 2016,
we re-sent our December 22, 2015 order to appellant by mail at the address
provided by his probation officer. This time, we directed appellant to file in the
trial court an amended notice of appeal that complied with the requirements of
rule 25.1(d) on or before March 22, 2016, and to file with this court a copy of the
amended notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d), (g), 37.1. We warned
appellant again that the appeal could be dismissed if he failed to comply with our
order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). Our March 2, 2016 order has not been
returned to us as undeliverable.
Appellant has not filed an amended notice of appeal. Because appellant
has failed to comply with our order requiring him to file an amended notice of
appeal, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.
WALKER, J., concurs without opinion.
DELIVERED: April 14, 2016
3