Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                               COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Appellate case name:        Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes v. Karen
    Tracy
    Appellate case number:      01-18-00913-CV
    Trial court case number:    1091620
    Trial court:                County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County
    Appellee’s counsel, E. F. Mano DeAyala and Andrew C. Wright, have filed a
    motion to withdraw as appellate counsel, explaining that appellee, Karen Tracy, passed
    away pending this appeal and counsel is not authorized to proceed with representation of
    appellee’s estate. Appellants, Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes, filed a
    response opposing appellee’s counsel’s withdrawal before a personal representative of
    appellee’s estate is appointed and substituted in this appeal. The parties have indicated that
    appellee’s state is in probate but no personal representative has yet been appointed. Texas
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 authorizes a court to permit an attorney to withdraw from
    representation of a client on appropriate terms and conditions. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5.
    Accordingly, the Court denies appellee’s motion to withdraw without prejudice to refiling
    after the terms and conditions set out below are met.
    The Court abates this appeal and remands to the trial court to hold a hearing, within
    60 days of the date of this order, to determine whether any heir or personal representative
    can substitute for appellee in this appeal, and whether the heir or representative wishes to
    file a brief. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 151, 152, 154; Casillas v. Cano, 
    79 S.W.3d 587
    , 591 (Tex.
    App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.). The trial court may extend the time to hold
    a hearing on any party’s motion.
    We order the county clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, and the court
    reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record, if any, within 15 days of the date of the
    hearing. We further order the parties to file a joint status update in 60 days of the date of
    this order and every 30 days thereafter. This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and
    removed from the Court’s active docket. The appeal will remain abated until the
    supplemental records are filed. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal at any
    time, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. Any party may file a motion
    to continue abatement.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature:    /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
     Acting individually        Acting for the Court
    Date: __December 17, 2019__
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-18-00913-CV

Filed Date: 12/17/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/18/2019