in Re Gerald Allen Perry v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued July 28, 2016
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-16-00567-CR
    ———————————
    IN RE GERALD ALLEN PERRY, Relator
    Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relator, Gerald Allen Perry, proceeding pro se and incarcerated, has filed a
    petition for writ of mandamus. Relator seeks to compel the respondent trial judge
    to vacate the order denying his motion to suppress evidence and to recall this Court’s
    mandate and vacate this Court’s judgment affirming his 1994 conviction in the
    underlying proceeding.1 We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
    1
    The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Gerald Allen Perry, Cause No. 607922,
    180th District Court, Harris County, Texas, The Honorable Catherine Evans
    As we previously stated in dismissing for want of jurisdiction relator’s similar
    appeal of the respondent’s 2014 order denying his motion to recall the 1994 mandate,
    “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction”
    and “[o]nly the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters
    related to post-conviction relief from a final felony conviction.” Perry v. State, No.
    01–14–00577–CR, 
    2014 WL 5593754
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov.
    4, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing, inter alia, TEX
    CODE. CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 2011)). Because relator’s
    felony conviction became final in 1994, this is a final post-conviction felony
    proceeding for which we lack jurisdiction. See 
    id. Accordingly, we
    dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of
    jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    presiding. We affirmed appellant’s conviction for aggravated robbery, for which
    his punishment was assessed at forty-five years’ confinement and a $2,000 fine, on
    February 24, 1994, and we issued our mandate on August 23, 1994. See Perry v.
    State, No. 01–93–00207–CR, 
    1994 WL 52499
    , at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st
    Dist.] Feb. 24, 1994, no writ) (not designated for publication).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-16-00567-CR

Filed Date: 7/28/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2016