Isaiah Maurice Hill v. State ( 2015 )

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2015.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00581-CR
ISAIAH MAURICE HILL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F11-34630-X
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
Isaiah Maurice Hill was convicted, following the adjudication of his guilt, of aggravated
assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the motion to
adjudicate guilt and was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment pursuant to a plea bargain
agreement. He waived his right to appeal as part of the agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18
S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified that appellant has no right
to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App.
2013); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 1
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
150581F.U05
1
Due to our disposition of the appeal, we take no action on appellant’s June 29, 2015 pro se “motion to overturn conviction.”
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ISAIAH MAURICE HILL, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
No. 6, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-15-00581-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F11-34630-X.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of
jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 9th day of July, 2015.
–3–