-
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-97-00591-CR
Charles Sam Longoria, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. B-96-0547-S, HONORABLE DICK ALCALA, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, third offense. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b) (West Supp. 1998). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for eight years.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
(1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See also Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75(1988); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
516 S.W.2d 684(Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State,
436 S.W.2d 137(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel's brief would serve no beneficial purpose.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and Kidd; Chief Justice Carroll not participating
Affirmed
Filed: February 5, 1998
Do Not Publish
Document Info
Docket Number: 03-97-00591-CR
Filed Date: 2/5/1998
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/5/2015