eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Appeals of Texas
 1999-11

Thurlow Ronnie Johnson v. State ( 1999 )


Menu:
 
  • 






    TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    

    


    


    

    

    

    NO. 03-99-00442-CR
    

    NO. 03-99-00443-CR
    

    

    

    

    Thurlow Ronnie Johnson, a/k/a Thurlow Ronnie Johnson, Jr., Appellant
    


    

    v.
    

    


    

    The State of Texas, Appellee
    

    


    


    

    

    

    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    
    

    NOS. 46,011 & 49,755, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
    

    

    

    
In number 3-99-442-CR, appellant Thurlow Ronnie Johnson appeals from an order
revoking community supervision; the underlying offense is forgery.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann.
§ 32.21 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999).  In number 3-99-443-CR, Johnson appeals from a judgment
of conviction for credit card abuse.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.31 (West 1994).  Appellant
pleaded true in the former cause and guilty in the latter.  The district court assessed punishment
in each cause at incarceration in a state jail for two years.

    Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
    386 U.S. 738 
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced.  See also Penson v. Ohio,
    488 U.S. 75 
    (1988); High v. State,
    573 S.W.2d 807 
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
    516 S.W.2d 684 
    (Tex. Crim. App.
1974); Jackson v. State,
    485 S.W.2d 553 
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State,
    436 S.W.2d 137 
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).  A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.  No pro se brief
has been filed.
    

    We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief and agree that the appeals are
frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the
appeals.
    

    In number 3-99-442-CR, the order revoking community supervision is affirmed.
In number 3-99-443-CR, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    


    


    

    	

    

    	Mack Kidd, Justice
    

    Before Justices Jones, Kidd and Patterson
    

    Affirmed on Both Causes
    

    Filed:   November 4, 1999
    

    Do Not Publish