Owen Chaney v. State ( 2001 )


Menu:
  • 
    
    
    
    
    
    

    TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






    NO. 03-01-00346-CR


    Owen Chaney, Appellant


    v.



    The State of Texas, Appellee






    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

    NO. 006514, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING


    PER CURIAM

    Appellant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), .09(b) (West Supp. 2001). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for six years, as called for in a plea bargain agreement. Both appellant, acting pro se, and appointed appellate counsel filed general notices of appeal.

    When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does not exceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal must state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant's notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State,

    45 S.W.3d 274
    , 275 (Tex. App.--Austin 2001, no pet.);
    see also Cooper v. State, 
    45 S.W.3d 77
    , 80-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.



    Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

    Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

    Filed: July 31, 2001

    Do Not Publish

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-01-00346-CR

Filed Date: 7/31/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/6/2015