eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Court of Appeals of Texas
 2003-11

Paul Greg Crow v. State ( 2003 )


Menu:
 
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-03-00266-CR
Paul Greg Crow, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 54,474, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Paul Greg Crow pleaded guilty to burglary of a building.
    Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02
     (West Supp. 2003). The district court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to two
years in state jail.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988); High v. State,
    573 S.W.2d 807
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
    516 S.W.2d 684
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);
Jackson v. State,
    485 S.W.2d 553
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State,
    436 S.W.2d 137
     (Tex.
Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his
right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s
motion to withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: November 20, 2003
Do Not Publish
2