Jordan Netherly v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    May 29, 2019
    No. 04-19-00085-CR
    Jordan NETHERLY,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2017CR11494
    Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Appellant, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the denial of her post-conviction
    application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
    ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a). Under the exclusive procedure outlined in article 11.07, only the
    convicting trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals have jurisdiction to review the merits of
    a post-conviction habeas petition; there is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the
    statutory scheme. 
    Id. art. 11.07,
    § 5 (providing “[a]fter conviction the procedure outlined in this
    Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in
    discharging the prisoner”). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post-
    conviction release from confinement for persons with a felony conviction. TEX. CODE CRIM.
    PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3; Hoang v. State, 
    872 S.W.2d 694
    , 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); In re
    Stone, 
    26 S.W.3d 568
    , 569 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding). The intermediate courts
    of appeals have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. Bd.
    of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 
    910 S.W.2d 481
    ,
    483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); see In re Coronado, 
    980 S.W.2d 691
    , 692 (Tex.
    App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Ngo, No. 02-16-00425-CR, 
    2016 WL 7405836
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Dec. 22, 2016) (mem. op., not designated for
    publication) (appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction).
    Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fourteen (14)
    days from the date of this order stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    _________________________________
    Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 29th day of May, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00085-CR

Filed Date: 5/29/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/30/2019