in the Interest of K. M., Jr. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                              COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:       In the Interest of K.E.S.M., Jr., Child; In the Interest of
    K.G.S.M., a.k.a. K.G.S.M.
    Appellate case numbers:    01-19-00285-CV & 01-19-00286-CV
    Trial court case numbers: 2017-04805J & 2018-01409J
    Trial court:               315th District Court of Harris County
    Appellant D.M.’s court-appointed counsel, Steven B. Frazier, filed a brief on June
    7, 2019, concluding that the above-referenced related parental termination appeals are
    frivolous. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744, 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 1400 (1967); In the
    Interest of K.D., et al., 
    127 S.W.3d 66
    , 67 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
    However, counsel has not filed a motion to withdraw from representation with the Clerk
    of this Court. See 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    . Even though an Anders brief in a termination
    case may not be “good cause” sufficient to justify counsel’s withdrawal, an Anders brief
    must accompany a motion to withdraw to notify appellant of her rights. See id.; see In the
    Interest of P.M., 
    520 S.W.3d 24
    , 27 (Tex. 2016).
    In addition, counsel must also inform this Court that he has mailed a copy of his
    motion to withdraw to her client and informed appellant of her right to review the records
    and to file a pro se response and, if so, she should immediately file a motion for pro se
    access to the records. See In the Interest of A.M., 
    495 S.W.3d 573
    , 582–83 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, pet. denied) (citations omitted) (denying counsel’s motion to
    withdraw in termination case, but noting that counsel’s duty to her client extends through
    exhaustion of all appeals and motion must inform client of right to review records and file
    pro se response). Because the Clerk of this Court already mailed a form motion for pro se
    access to the records to appellant, counsel does not need to send the form motion.
    Accordingly, the Court orders appellant’s counsel, Steven B. Frazier, to file a
    motion to withdraw informing appellant D.M. as noted above within 10 days of the date
    of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 9; In the Interest of 
    A.M., 495 S.W.3d at 582
    –83.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Laura C. Higley____
    Acting individually      Acting for the Court
    Date: ___June 18, 2019__
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-19-00285-CV

Filed Date: 6/18/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2019