John Shull v. Westover Crossing (San Antonio) Homeowners' Association, Inc. Spectrum Association Management, LP And Buck (Delvin) Benson ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                            Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    June 15, 2016
    No. 04-15-00692-CV
    John SHULL,
    Appellant
    v.
    WESTOVER CROSSING (SAN ANTONIO) HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.;
    Spectrum Association Management, LP; and Buck (Delvin) Benson,
    Appellees
    From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2014-CI-15954
    Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In response to Appellant John Shull’s repeated telephone calls and e-mails to the clerk of
    this court and his then-pending motions, on May 20, 2016, we denied Appellant’s motion to
    include in the appellate record documents he sent to this court by e-mail. We reminded
    Appellant that the clerk of this court has already informed him of the methods for filing
    documents, see TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(2), and for supplementing the appellate record, see 
    id. R. 34.5(c).
           On June 3, 2016, Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of our May 20, 2016 order.
    On June 8, 2016, we denied Appellant’s requests for, inter alia, this court to include in the
    appellate record documents Appellant e-mailed to this court.
    On June 13, 2016, Appellant again e-mailed the clerk of this court seeking action by the
    court. We remind Appellant that any documents Appellant sends to this court by e-mail will not
    be filed, will not become part of the appellate record, and will not be considered by the court.
    See Sadler v. Tex. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Companies, No. 04-12-00789-CV, 
    2013 WL 4736392
    ,
    at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 4, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Perry v. S.N., 
    973 S.W.2d 301
    , 303 (Tex. 1998) (“We may not consider factual assertions that appear solely in the
    appellate briefs and not before the trial court.”); Sabine Offshore Serv., Inc. v. City of Port
    Arthur, 
    595 S.W.2d 840
    , 841 (Tex. 1979) (“Affidavits outside the record cannot be considered
    by the Court of Civil Appeals for any purpose other than determining its own jurisdiction.”).
    This court will no longer respond to any e-mail communications from Appellant. All
    further correspondence must be by written motion or request filed with the clerk of the court.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1.
    Any further request to supplement the appellate record must be directed to the trial court
    clerk. See 
    id. R. 34.5(c).
    The request must be specific: it should identify the document filed in
    the trial court by its title and filing date. See 
    id. R. 34.5(b)(2).
    This court will consider
    documents properly included in the appellate record whether in original or supplemental records.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 34.6(d).
    We respectfully remind Appellant that he must file his brief with this court not later than
    June 30, 2016.
    NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL
    BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails to file his brief as ordered, the court may dismiss this appeal
    for want of prosecution without further notice. See 
    id. R. 38.8(a)(1),
    42.3(b).
    _________________________________
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 15th day of June, 2016.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-15-00692-CV

Filed Date: 6/15/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2016