in Re: Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                            COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §               No. 08-16-00103-CV
    IN RE: LINDA S. RESTREPO AND                         §            ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    CARLOS E. RESTREPO,
    §          ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF
    RELATORS.
    §                  PROHIBITION
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Relators, Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo, have filed a petition for writ of
    prohibition against the Honorable Stephen Ables, presiding judge of the County Court at Law
    No. 5 of El Paso County, Texas.1 Relators have also filed a motion to stay the proceedings in the
    trial court. The motion to stay and the petition for writ of prohibition are denied.
    A writ of prohibition operates like an injunction issued by a superior court to control,
    limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals,
    
    767 S.W.2d 680
    , 682 (Tex. 1989); In re Cap Rock Energy Corporation, 
    225 S.W.3d 160
    (Tex.App.--El Paso 2005, original proceeding). The purpose of the writ is to enable a superior
    court to protect and enforce its jurisdiction and judgments. 
    Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683
    ;
    
    Caprock, 225 S.W.3d at 160
    . The writ is typically used to protect the subject matter of an appeal
    or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and
    1
    Judge Ables is sitting by assignment.
    judgments. 
    Holloway, 767 S.W.2d at 683
    . An appellate court does not have jurisdiction, absent
    actual jurisdiction of a pending proceeding, to issue a writ of prohibition requiring that a trial
    court refrain from performing a future act. See In re Nguyen, 
    155 S.W.3d 191
    , 194 (Tex.App.--
    Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding); Lesikar v. Anthony, 
    750 S.W.2d 338
    , 339 (Tex.App.--Houston
    [1st Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding).
    Having reviewed the petition and attached appendix, we find that the Restrepos have
    failed to establish that issuance of the writ of prohibition is necessary to protect the subject
    matter of a pending appeal or to prohibit interference with enforcement of an order or judgment
    of this Court. Accordingly, we deny the motion to stay and the petition for writ of prohibition.
    See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a), 52.10.
    June 1, 2016
    YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice
    Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
    Hughes, J., Not Participating
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-16-00103-CV

Filed Date: 6/1/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/6/2016