Schlittler, David ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • June 16, 2016
    FILED IN
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    ,Mr Abel Acosta
    Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals                               HIM PO 9niR
    po box 12308                                                   Juntumb
    Capitol Station
    Austin, tx 78711                                            Abel Acosta, Clerk
    RE:   Schlittler v State
    CCA No. PD-1505-14
    Trial Court Case No.    30390
    Dear Mr Acosta;
    Please find enclosed, my Motion for Appointment of Counsel.   Would vou
    please file these in the matter and promptly bring them to the Honorable Courts
    attention for consideration of same.
    Thank you, in advance, for vour help!
    Respectfully,
    David Schlittler # 1498090
    Lynaugh Unit
    1098 S Hwy 2037
    Ft Stockton, TX    79735
    cc:   Ms Lisa C^Mcmnn
    State Eifosecuting Attorney
    P 0 Bfrc 13406
    Austin, TX 78711
    Ms Melinc&'Fletcher
    Special Prosecution Unit
    P,,0Jbx 1744
    frillo, TX   79105
    COURT OF   CRIMINAL APPEALS      NO.   PD1505-14
    APPEAL CAUSE NO.         12-13-00269-CR
    DAVID C SCHLITTLER                     §      IN THE COURT OF
    Appellant                              §
    §
    V.                                     §      CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
    §
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                     §
    Appellee                               §      AT AUSTIN,   TEXAS
    MOTION   FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
    TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:
    COMES NOW, David C Schlittler, Appellant Prose in the above Cause Numbers,
    with this Motion for An Appointment of Counsel pursuant to Rule 2 & 10.1, Texas
    Rules of Appellant Procedure & respectfully shows unto the Court:
    Appellant filed a Prose Motion for an Out of Time Motion for Rehearing
    requesting the Honorable Court consider the fundamental rights violated in
    the prosecution of the matter, but which were not presented for review.
    The Court granted the motion & withdrew its May 23, 2016 Mandate on June
    6, 2016, allowing AoDellant until July 12, 2016 to file the brief.
    II.
    This Court has Dreviouslv held that a Motion for Rehearin? mav he consi
    dered to decide an issue not presented in an original brief!       See Hushes v
    State. 
    878 S.W.2d 142
    . 151 (TCA1992).
    The review of these fundamental rights is DroDer and as such, it gives
    the Appellate Courts an opportunity to examine the issues ovephg^j©P *nus__.A, c
    rv
    CRIMINAL fcPPE*1*
    promoting efficiency in the legal system & would ber^UBe* wtbrest of iustice.
    JUM 20 a»
    ^el Acosta,Clerk
    III.
    Appellant, having iust received the granting of his motion, instantly
    brings this motion due to the great respect for the Courts precious time &
    understands that brief writing is a 'learned' science.   Therefore, as a layman,
    unskilled & uneducated in law, offers that the assistance of a competent att
    orney skilled in constitutional law, would be best at briefing the merit's
    concisely & as briefly as possible, so as to allow the Court proper argument
    and case citings saving the Court time in determining the constitutional claims.
    IV.
    Recognizing that a rehearing can be used to bring issues which were not
    brought in an original appellant brief, is a reference to the appeal.   There
    fore, appointed assistance would be made an indigent unless the waiver of same
    was given.   Appellant was appointed counsel for the appeal and does not silently
    waive the close assistance of counsel for briefing this matter.
    Appellant recognizes "tferight to be heard would be, in many cases, of
    little avail if it did not comprehend the right to be heard by counsel."
    PowellwAlabama, 
    287 U.S. 45
    (1932).
    V,
    WHEREFORE CONSIDERED, Appellant prays the Court grant this motion
    appointing an attorney for this proceeding for good cause & to expidite a de
    cision on the constitutional deprivations as applied to Appellant which were
    not Dresented or considered in the original brief & that has importance in
    not only Appellant's case, but others, who may be similarly situated.
    Respectfully submitted.
    David Schlittler
    TDCJ # 1498090
    Lynaugh Unit
    1098 S Hwv 2037
    Ft Stockton, TX    79735
    Appellant, Prose
    CERTIFICATE   OF   SERVICE
    T certify that a true and correct copy of the Motion for An Appointment
    of Counsel has been served upon the parties below, by placing same in a postage
    prepaid envelope, and dspositing same in the Lynaugh Unit's mail system on
    this, the 16th day of June, 2016.
    Ms Lisa C McMirm
    State Prosecuting Attorney
    P 0 Box 13046
    Austin, TX 78711
    Ms Melinda Fletcher
    Special Prosecution Uinit
    P 0 Box 1744
    Amarildo, TX   79105
    David Schlittler
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-1505-14

Filed Date: 6/20/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2016