Joseph Barnard Hines v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-15-00274-CR
    JOSEPH BARNARD HINES, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 180th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 776436
    MEMORANDUM                          OPINION
    Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery. On November 1,
    1999, pursuant to an agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to
    confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department
    of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal on August
    8, 2000. This court dismissed appellant’s direct appeal for want of jurisdiction. See
    Hines v. State, No. 14-00-01014-CR, 
    2001 WL 8322
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston
    [14th Dist.] Jan. 4, 2001, no pet.) (not designated for publication).
    On February 16, 2015, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal attempting to
    challenge the order from the juvenile court waiving jurisdiction over him,
    certifying him for trial as an adult, and transferring the aggravated robbery case to
    the criminal court. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.02 (West 2014). According to
    the notice of appeal, appellant was originally charged with aggravated robbery as a
    juvenile in the 313th District Court. A defendant may appeal an order of a juvenile
    court certifying him to stand trial as an adult and transferring him to a criminal
    court only in conjunction with the appeal from the conviction or order deferring
    adjudication of the offense for which the defendant was transferred. Tex. Code
    Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.47 (West 2006); Moon v. State, 
    451 S.W.3d 28
    , 39–40
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (stating a juvenile offender may not immediately appeal
    from the juvenile court’s waiver of jurisdiction; instead, he must wait until he has
    been convicted in an adult criminal court to complain on appeal of some error in
    the juvenile court’s transfer ruling). Therefore, appellant was required to appeal the
    juvenile court’s order in a timely appeal from his aggravated robbery conviction.
    We lack jurisdiction over this attempted appeal. To invoke an appellate
    court’s jurisdiction over an appeal, an appellant must file a timely and proper
    notice of appeal. Woods v. State, 
    68 S.W.3d 667
    , 669 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). If an
    appellate court’s jurisdiction is not properly invoked, the court has no power to act
    other than to dismiss the appeal. 
    Id. Appellant’s notice
    of appeal filed in 2015 is
    untimely to appeal the juvenile certification order leading to his 1999 conviction.
    Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justice Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00274-CR

Filed Date: 4/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/22/2015