Martha Barron v. Fernando Barron ( 2016 )

Opinion issued August 2, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-16-00175-CV
———————————
MARTHA BARRON, Appellant
V.
FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for
purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in
the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial
Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c)
(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.
2