in Re Robert Randall Long ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
    February 20, 2014.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-14-00049-CR
    NO. 14-14-00050-CR
    NO. 14-14-00051-CR
    IN RE ROBERT RANDALL LONG, Relator
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    177th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause Nos. 1216882, 1235282, and 1273161
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On January 15, 2014, relator Robert Randall Long filed a petition for writ of
    mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P.
    52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Ryan Patrick,
    presiding judge of the 177th District Court of Harris County, to vacate an alleged
    order withdrawing relator’s right to proceed with pro se representation in his
    defense.
    Relator, however, has not included with his petition a written order of the
    trial court withdrawing relator’s pro se representation or any part of the reporter’s
    record containing an oral ruling by the trial court withdrawing relator’s pro se
    representation. In seeking mandamus relief, a relator is required to provide “a
    certified or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document
    showing the matter complained of.” Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Accordingly,
    the record in a petition for writ of mandamus generally must contain either a
    written order from the trial court or that portion of the reporter’s record
    demonstrating an oral ruling by the trial court. See In re Bill Heard Chevrolet, Ltd.,
    
    209 S.W.3d 311
    , 316 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding).
    “Those seeking the extraordinary remedy of mandamus must follow the
    applicable procedural rules.” In re Le, 
    335 S.W.3d 808
    , 813 (Tex. App.—Houston
    [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding). “Chief among these is the critical obligation
    to provide the reviewing court with a complete and adequate record.” 
    Id. Without documentation
    showing the action of the trial court of which relator complains, he
    cannot satisfy his obligation to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. See
    Walker v. Packer, 
    827 S.W.2d 833
    , 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
    2
    Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel Consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-14-00049-CR

Filed Date: 2/20/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/22/2015