in the Interest of J.R. and I.R., Children ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order filed August 31, 2016
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-16-00203-CV
    __________
    IN THE INTEREST OF J.R. AND I.R., CHILDREN
    On Appeal from the 326th District Court
    Taylor County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 8126-CX
    ORDER
    In this accelerated parental-termination appeal, the mother filed a pro se notice
    of appeal and an affidavit of indigence in the district clerk’s office on July 25, 2016.
    The mother has filed in this court a motion for court-appointed counsel. We abate
    the appeal.
    The record in this case indicates that the trial court determined that the mother
    was indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel. Sometime after counsel was
    appointed, the trial court found that the mother had “discharged that attorney” and
    that the mother was “not entitled to a second court-appointed attorney.”
    Consequently, the mother represented herself at trial.
    Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(3), “a parent determined by the trial court
    to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the duration of the suit and any
    subsequent appeal.” Moreover, the appointment of an attorney ad litem to represent
    an indigent parent is mandatory in a suit filed by a governmental entity seeking
    termination of the parent-child relationship. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a)
    (West ____). We note that the Texas Supreme Court has recently determined that
    the courts “have a duty to see that withdrawal of counsel will not result in foreseeable
    prejudice to the client” in a parental termination case. In re P.M., No. 15-0171, 
    2016 WL 1274748
    , at *3 (Tex. Apr. 1, 2016). The court stressed the importance of
    counsel for the parents in such cases when it stated, “If a court of appeals allows an
    attorney to withdraw, it must provide for the appointment of new counsel to pursue
    a petition for review.” 
    Id. The court
    also indicated that this court should abate an
    appeal and refer the case to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel when
    new counsel is necessary. 
    Id. at *3
    n.13
    Accordingly, we abate this appeal and direct the trial court to appoint counsel
    for the mother on or before September 12, 2016. Immediately thereafter, the district
    clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record in this court containing any order
    entered by the trial court with respect to the appointment of counsel for the mother.
    At that time, the appeal will be reinstated. The mother’s appellate brief will be due
    to be filed in this court twenty days after reinstatement.1
    The appeal is abated.
    August 31, 2016                                                     PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
    1
    We note that this appeal is accelerated, and so far as reasonably possible, this court must ensure
    that the appeal is brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-16-00203-CV

Filed Date: 8/31/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/31/2016