Jamie v. Villasenor v. Cequel III Communications I, LLC D/B/A Suddenlink Communications and Knight-Hawk Security Services, Inc. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-16-00222-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    JAMIE V. VILLASENOR,                                      §    APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
    APPELLANT
    V.
    §    JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I,
    LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK
    COMMUNICATIONS AND KNIGHT-
    HAWK SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,                             §    SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
    APPELLEES
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
    By letter dated August 1, 2016, this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this
    appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee,
    on or before August 11, 2016, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including
    dismissal of the case without further notice. The date for paying the filing fee has passed, and
    Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.
    Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is
    dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Opinion delivered August 17, 2016.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    AUGUST 17, 2016
    NO. 12-16-00222-CV
    JAMIE V. VILLASENOR,
    Appellant
    V.
    CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK
    COMMUNICATIONS AND KNIGHT-HAWK SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
    Appellees
    Appeal from the 241st District Court
    of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-0726-C)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
    below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-16-00222-CV

Filed Date: 8/17/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/18/2016