Sharon Ann Gribble, Individually and in Her Capacity as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Michael Ray Gribble v. Brent Allen Layton ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Order filed September 20, 2012.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-11-00856-CV
    ____________
    SHARON ANN GRIBBLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS
    GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF MICHAEL RAY
    GRIBBLE, Appellant
    V.
    BRENT ALLEN LAYTON, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 306th District Court
    Galveston County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 09FD0426
    ORDER
    This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 30, 2011. Appellant filed a timely
    motion for new trial. The notice of appeal was due September 28, 2011, ninety days after
    the judgment was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed the notice of appeal
    on September 29, 2011, one day late. Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to
    file the notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. A motion to extend time is
    Anecessarily implied@ when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due
    date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). While an extension may be
    implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to
    support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 
    974 S.W.2d 805
    , 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
    Appellant filed a motion to extend time deadlines to determine indigency and for
    filing the reporter’s record, which this court granted. The motion contained a reasonable
    explanation for the late determinationof appellant’s indigency, if any, and the need for
    additional time to file the reporter’s record. The motion did not expressly refer to the late-
    filed notice of appeal, however.
    Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file
    the notice of appeal containing a reasonable explanation for the late filing within 15 days
    of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply
    with this order, the court will consider dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
    PER CURIAM
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-11-00856-CV

Filed Date: 9/20/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015