in Re Valerie Udobaku Oji ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
    October 4, 2012.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-12-00855-CV
    IN RE VALERIE UDOBAKU OJI, Relator
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    On Appeal from the 311th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2001-46524
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On September 19, 2012, relator, Valerie Udobaku Oji, filed a petition for writ of
    habeas corpus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also
    Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator alleges she is under illegal restraint from three orders
    holding her in contempt for failure to pay child support.           Commitment has been
    suspended.
    As to all three orders, relator claims the order is void because she was not given
    notice of the hearing. The first order was purportedly signed November 11, 2010. The
    entire order is not in the record, but on the first page the order states relator “appeared in
    person and without counsel and announced ready for trial.” The second order was signed
    March 3, 2011, and states relator appeared in person and by attorney. The third order,
    signed April 13, 2011, states relator appeared in person and by attorney and that the
    hearing was recorded by a court reporter. No record of the hearing was filed.
    The record before this court reflects relator was present. Nothing in the record
    demonstrates a lack of notice. Moreover, the record does not reflect relator objected to a
    lack of notice, challenged the jurisdiction of the trial court, or asked for a continuance.
    See Ex parte Waldrep, 
    783 S.W.2d 332
    , 334 (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 1990,
    orig. proceeding). The record does not demonstrate the lack of notice, if any, had an
    adverse effect upon the relator’s ability to protect her interest or defend herself. See 
    id. Accordingly, relator
    has not established a denial of due process.
    Because relator has not established she is entitled to relief, we deny her petition
    for writ of habeas corpus.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12-00855-CV

Filed Date: 10/4/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015