in the Interest of K.G.S. and T.W.S., Children ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed August 17, 2012
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-12-00673-CV
    ____________
    IN THE INTEREST OF K.G.S. AND T.W.S., CHILDREN
    On Appeal from the 312th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2009-01569
    ABATEMENT ORDER
    In the underlying suit to modify the parent-child relationship, the Texas
    Department of Family and Protective Services intervened for protection of the children,
    and the Department was named temporary managing conservator of the children by order
    signed June 25, 2012. The Mother of the children counterclaimed against the Department,
    and the trial court granted the Department’s plea to the jurisdiction. The Mother then
    brought this interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §51.014(a)(8). Under
    this subsection of the statute, all proceedings in the trial court are stayed pending
    resolution of the interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §51.014(b).
    The stay provision in Section 51.014(b) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code
    conflicts with the Family Code statutes governing cases brought by the Department for
    child protection. See Tex. Fam. Code §§263.201, 263.304, 263.305, 263.401.
    Accordingly, on August 16, 2012, the Department filed a motion asking this court to
    abate the interlocutory appeal so that the trial court may conduct a statutorily required
    status hearing no later than August 24, 2012. See Tex. Fam. Code § 263.201. We have
    authority to make an “appropriate order that the law and the nature of the case
    require[s].” See Tex. R. App. P. 43.6. We GRANT the motion and issue the following
    order:
    We order the appeal ABATED for the trial court to conduct a status hearing
    pursuant to Tex. Fam. Code § 263.201. During the abatement period, the trial court may
    consider an appropriate motion to sever the child protection action from the Mother’s
    counterclaims. A supplemental clerk’s record containing any new order(s) signed by the
    trial court shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before September 7, 2012.
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s
    active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the
    supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an
    appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate
    the appeal on its own motion.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12-00673-CV

Filed Date: 8/17/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015