J.C. Walter, III and v. Marathon Oil Corporation and Marathon E.G. LPG Limited ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Order filed June 12, 2012
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-12-00011-CV
    ____________
    J.C. WALTER, III, ET. AL., Appellants
    V.
    MARATHON OIL CORPORATION AND MARATHON E.G. LPG LIMITED,
    Appellees
    On Appeal from the 295th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2009-58805
    ABATEMENT ORDER
    The parties filed an agreed motion to file appellate briefing under seal. Attached
    to the motion is a “Temporary Sealing Order” signed December 6, 2011, in which the
    trial court temporarily sealed documents in the case below. The trial court’s order is a
    temporary sealing order; it does not set a hearing pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil
    Procedure 76a for a permanent sealing order.
    Court records “are presumed to be open to the general public.” Tex. R. Civ. P.
    76a(1). The sealing of a record must meet the procedural prerequisites set forth in Rule
    76a. See Davenport v. Garcia, 
    834 S.W.2d 4
    , 23–24 (Tex. 1992). Section 4 of Rule 76a
    provides:
    4. Hearing. A hearing, open to the public, on a motion to seal court records
    shall be held in open court as soon as practicable, but not less than fourteen
    days after the motion is filed and notice is posted. Any party may participate
    in the hearing. Non-parties may intervene as a matter of right for the limited
    purpose of participating in the proceedings, upon payment of the fee required
    for filing a plea in intervention. The court may inspect records in camera
    when necessary. The court may determine a motion relating to sealing or
    unsealing court records in accordance with the procedures prescribed by
    Rule 120a.
    The parties’ motion does not reflect that the trial court held a hearing as required by Rule
    76a. Before restricting public access to filed court records, the court must comply with
    the procedural requirements of the rule, including motion, posted notice, public hearing,
    and public order. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 76a(3)–(4), (6); Gen. Tire, Inc. v. Kepple, 
    970 S.W.2d 520
    523–24 (Tex. 1998). The appellate court may seal the appellate record on an
    agreed motion when the trial court has properly ordered court records sealed.
    We ORDER the judge of the 295th District Court to immediately conduct a
    hearing at which appellants, appellees, and their counsel shall be present to determine
    whether the record and briefs in this case constitute court records under Rule 76a, and if
    they do, to hold the Rule 76a hearing and determine whether the documents should be
    sealed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 76a(1), (8).
    The trial judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings
    of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the
    hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions.
    Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before July 12, 2012.
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active
    docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s
    findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an
    appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate
    the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement
    to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with
    this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial
    court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and McCally.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12-00011-CV

Filed Date: 6/12/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015