in the Interest of D.M.K, C.A.A.K., J.J.K. and J.A.K, Children ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed in Part; Reversed in Part; Remanded; and Memorandum Opinion filed
    June 11, 2012.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ___________________
    NO. 14-11-01046-CV
    ___________________
    IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.K., C.A.A.K., J.J.K., AND J.A.K., CHILDREN
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    Washington County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CCL-6454
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    In this appeal from the involuntary termination of his parental rights, I.W.K.,1 the
    adoptive father of his four step-grandchildren, argues that the trial court reversibly erred in
    failing to appoint counsel before trial to represent him. He contends that he was entitled
    by statute to appointed counsel because he was indigent and because the Department of
    Family and Protective Services sought termination based on his limited mental capacity.
    See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 161.003(a)(1), 171.013(a)(1) (West 2008). The trial court
    1
    To protect the children’s identities, we refer to them and to their adoptive parents only by their
    initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West Supp. 2011); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(b)(2).
    appointed counsel to represent I.W.K. on appeal, and the appellate attorney filed a motion
    to abate while conferring with counsel for the other parties.
    Counsel for the Department of Family and Protective Services and the children’s
    attorney ad litem agree with I.W.K.’s appellate counsel that the trial court erred in failing to
    appoint an attorney to represent I.W.K. sooner. After reviewing the record, we agree.
    The trial court also terminated the parental rights of I.W.K.’s wife D.K., and although she
    joins her husband in this appeal, she does not challenge the termination of her own parental
    rights.
    We accordingly (a) deny the motion to abate the appeal as moot; (b) reverse the
    portions of the trial court’s judgment terminating I.W.K.’s parental rights and appointing
    the Department permanent managing conservator of the children; (c) affirm the portion of
    the judgment terminating D.K.’s parental rights; (d) reinstate the trial court’s order
    appointing the Department temporary managing conservator; and (e) remand the case for
    further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
    /s/       Tracy Christopher
    Justice
    Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-11-01046-CV

Filed Date: 6/11/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015