Gary Franklin v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-05-00184-CR
    Gary Eugene Franklin, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 933724, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING
    OPINION
    Gary Franklin was placed on deferred adjudication supervision after he pleaded guilty
    to sexually assaulting a child. Franklin has now been adjudicated guilty and he seeks to appeal. The
    trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Franklin has no right of appeal. See Tex.
    R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
    A defendant who plea bargains for deferred adjudication has a right to appeal,
    following a subsequent adjudication, issues unrelated to the conviction but no right to appeal issues
    related to the conviction. Woods v. State, 
    68 S.W.3d 667
    , 669 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Kirtley v.
    State, 
    56 S.W.3d 48
    , 51 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Vidaurri v. State, 
    49 S.W.3d 711
    , 884-85 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2001). The form promulgated by the court of criminal appeals to certify the defendant’s
    right of appeal does not provide for this conditional right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. appendix
    (found at Tex. R. App. P. 25.2, notes and comments (West 2003)); and see Kahookele v. State, No.
    03-04-00493-CR (Tex. App.—Austin May 12, 2005, no pet. h.); Carroll v. State, 
    119 S.W.3d 838
    ,
    840 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
    The trial court’s certification that Franklin has no right of appeal is incorrect and
    therefore defective. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (inaccurate
    certification is defective). We abate the appeal for ten days and instruct the trial court to prepare and
    send to this Court an amended certification that accurately reflects Franklin’s conditional right of
    appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 37.1; see 
    Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614
    . The certification should state that there
    was a plea bargain for deferred adjudication, but following an adjudication of guilt the defendant has
    the right of appeal as to issues unrelated to the conviction. See Kahookele, slip op. at 5-6.
    The appeal is abated.
    __________________________________________
    W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear
    Filed: May 16, 2005
    Publish
    2