Patricia Salvato, M.D. v. Michelle Winsmann F/K/A Michelle Naquin ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • Abatement Order filed March 29, 2012.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-12-00166-CV
    ____________
    PATRICIA SALVATO, M.D., Appellant
    V.
    MICHELLE WINSMANN f/k/a MICHELLE NAQUIN, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 269th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2011-37079
    ABATEMENT                  ORDER
    This is an appeal from an order denying an award of attorney’s fees and costs of
    court in connection with appellant’s motion to dismiss a medical liability action for failure
    to provide an expert report, which was signed November 18, 2011. On November 17,
    2011, the plaintiff/appellee filed a notice of non-suit pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil
    Procedure 162. The clerk’s record filed with this court does not contain an order on the
    non-suit, and the record does not indicate that an order was signed.
    A notice of non-suit is effective when filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 162; Shadowbrook
    Apts. v. Abu–Ahmad, 
    783 S.W.2d 210
    , 211 (Tex. 1990). Appellate timetables do not run
    from the date a nonsuit is filed, however; the date the trial court signs an order of dismissal
    controls for purposes of appeal. See Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 
    907 S.W.2d 495
    , 496
    (Tex. 1995); see also Travelers Ins. Co. v Joachim, 
    315 S.W.3d 860
    , 865 n.4 (Tex. 2010)
    (noting that although a nonsuit is effective upon its filing, expiration of plenary power is
    determined from the date on which a trial court signs an order dismissing the suit). A
    subsequent order granting the nonsuit is a ministerial act. UTMB at Galveston v. Estate of
    Blackmon, 
    195 S.W.3d 98
    , 100 (Tex. 2006) (per curiam).
    Therefore, an order of non-suit is required so that appellant may appeal from a final
    order. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides as follows:
    The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be
    modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all
    proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.
    Tex. R. App. P. 27.2.
    Accordingly, we order the case abated and remanded to the trial court for a period of
    thirty days so that the trial court may sign an order of non-suit, if the court has not already
    done so. A supplemental clerk=s record containing the trial court’s order of non-suit shall
    be filed with the clerk of this court on or before April 30, 2012.
    In addition, appellant’s notice of appeal states that this is an accelerated appeal from
    an interlocutory order. Appellant is ORDERED to file an amended notice of appeal to
    reflect that the order being appealed is a final order and the appeal is not accelerated. The
    amended notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before April 30,
    2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(g).
    The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active
    docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the supplemental
    clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to
    reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own
    motion.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Jamison and McCally.
    2