Christopher Dean Johnson v. State ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






    NO. 03-06-00674-CR


    Christopher Dean Johnson, Appellant


    v.



    The State of Texas, Appellee






    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

    NO. 59617, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING


    M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


    Appellant Christopher Dean Johnson pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.07 (West 2003). The court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to twenty months in state jail.

    Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

    We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.

    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.





    __________________________________________

    Jan P. Patterson, Justice

    Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

    Affirmed

    Filed: April 27, 2007

    Do Not Publish