in the Interest of J.S.A-S., Children ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 14, 2013.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-13-00946-CV
    IN THE INTEREST OF J.S.A.-S., A CHILD
    On Appeal from the 309th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2008-39339
    MEMORANDUM                         OPINION
    This is an attempted appeal from an order signed July 29, 2013, terminating
    the parental rights of appellant, A.A., to the child referenced above. On August 2,
    2013, the trial court signed an order granting a new trial on the issue of managing
    conservatorship of the child. The order reinstated the temporary order naming the
    Texas Department of Family and Protective Services as temporary managing
    conservator of the child. Accordingly, the termination order is not final. See M.C.
    v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 
    300 S.W.3d 300
    , 303 (Tex. App.—
    El Paso 2008, pet. denied) (dismissing interlocutory appeal after finding a
    termination order is not a “final order” when it appoints the Department as the
    child’s temporary managing conservator); see also In re E.A.F., No. 14-13-00618-
    CV, 
    2013 WL 4945751
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 12, 2013, no pet.)
    (mem. op.) (dismissing termination appeal where the order did not dispose of all
    parties and issues); In re F.M.-T., No. 02-12-00522-CV, 
    2013 WL 1337789
    (Tex.
    App.—Fort Worth Apr. 4, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for want of
    jurisdiction when the trial court’s order did not terminate the rights of the
    presumed father of one of the children).
    On October 24, 2013, this court notified the parties that this appeal would be
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response demonstrating
    this court’s jurisdiction on or before November 4, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P.
    42.3(a). No response was filed.
    Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The
    dismissal is without prejudice to the filing of a new appeal after the trial court signs
    a final judgment.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Brown.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-13-00946-CV

Filed Date: 11/14/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015