Diana E. Rodriguez v. State ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 10, 2013.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-13-00148-CR
    DIANA E. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 400th District Court
    Fort Bend County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 05-DCR-043094
    MEMORANDUM                          OPINION
    Appellant entered a plea of guilty to theft, a state jail felony offense. On
    March 24, 2006, pursuant to an agreement with the State, the trial court deferred a
    finding of guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for four years. On
    July 26, 2011, appellant filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking to
    set aside the plea. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.072. On February 4, 2013, the
    trial court signed an order denying the requested relief, and appellant filed a timely
    notice of appeal.
    No brief was filed in this appeal. On September 9, 2013, this court ordered a
    hearing to determine why appellant’s counsel had not filed a brief. On September
    19, 2013, the trial court conducted the hearing, and a record of the hearing was
    filed in this court on September 26, 2013. At the hearing, retained counsel for
    appellant informed the court that appellant no longer wishes to appeal. No motion
    to dismiss the appeal has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. We may consider
    the appeal based on the record from the hearing in the trial court, however. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Based on the record, we will treat counsel’s statements to
    the court at the hearing as a request to dismiss the appeal without a written motion.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 2 (permitting the court to suspend a rule’s operation to
    expedite a decision or for other good cause); Conners v. State, 
    966 S.W.2d 108
    ,
    110–11 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref’d) (applying Rule 2 to
    suspend Rule 42.2’s requirement for a signed motion). We grant the request for
    dismissal.
    Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce, and Jamison.
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-13-00148-CR

Filed Date: 10/10/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2015