City of East Mountain v. Kenneth Craig Miller ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-17-00055-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    CITY OF EAST MOUNTAIN,                                    §    APPEAL FROM THE
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                        §    COUNTY COURT
    KENNETH CRAIG MILLER,
    APPELLEE                                                  §    UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    On February 17, 2017, the clerk of this Court notified Appellant, City of East Mountain,
    that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that
    failure to remit the filing fee on or before February 27, 2017, would result in the Court’s taking
    appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.3(c). The date for remitting the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the
    Court’s request.
    Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is
    dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Opinion delivered March 1, 2017.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    MARCH 1, 2017
    NO. 12-17-00055-CV
    CITY OF EAST MOUNTAIN,
    Appellant
    V.
    KENNETH CRAIG MILLER,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the County Court
    of Upshur County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 16CV00139)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
    considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
    below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-17-00055-CV

Filed Date: 3/1/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/8/2017