-
. - l m ;UZU ~‘OL! [COVER LETTER] Dear Clerk: Enclosed you will find my (Pro Se) objections to the Trial Court's Order recommending dismissal of my sub- sequent writ application. Will you please file these documents and bring them to the attention of the Honorable Judges of the court. I thank you for your assistance with this matter. RECENE» lN C©uRT oF ch.alNAL APPEALS JUL 08 2015 Abe!A@oSie,CBezk DATE: July 3rd/2015 899 F.M. 632 CONNALLY UNIT KENEDY, TEXAS 78119* (Pro Se) §R§¢QENE® z!N `` @§UWF @ig @MQWIEWM, H*PPEAL§ §UL 98 Z@?‘§ l No . 2001-cR-1015-w3 AD@!AQ@S‘€Q,CH@YK Ex PARTE ‘ § IN THE DISTRICT coURT ‘»./\ § 175TH JUDICIAL bISTRIcT- ADoNIS wAREEs wASHINGToN § BEXAR coUNTY, TExAs APPLICANT'S OBJECTION(S) TO THE HABEAS COURT'S ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF HIS SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE/JUDGES OF SAID COURT: Comes now, Adonis Warees Washington, Applicant in the above styled and numbered cause and files this his written object~ ion(s) to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal of his subsequent application under § ll.O7 4(a). These object- ions are brought forth pursuant to Tex. C.C.P. art's ll.lO/ ll.49, 39.05 and Tex. R. App. P. Rule(s) 10 et seq., 33.1 et seq. and 38.7. I. The Applicant (Washington) now presents the following objections to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal of his subsequent application under § ll.O7 4(a)(2), and for good cause presents the following: II. Washington petitions this Honorable Court to hold his § ll.O7 habeas corpus writ application in [A]beyance and remand this cause back to the trial court for a hearing to resolve the interpretation of a [f]actual .finding that the culpable mental state associated with his conviction for [intent]ional (l). murder was never established by the evidence presented at his trial. The nature of this statement in conjunction with the allegations of fact inside of Washington's subsequent writ application "clearly" make a prima facie actual innocence claim showing that by a preponderance of the evidence/ but for a violation of the United States Constitutionj [no] rational juror could have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Tex. Code. Crim. Proc. art. ll.07 § 4(a)(2). The trial court(i.e., Judge Mary Roman) has recently con~ tested both the actual and constitutional nature of it's pre- vious factual finding that the record evidence(in Washington's cause) [does not show] that the shooting in his case was intent- ional. Washington asks at the very least, that the same court which issued this exonerative statement, be given an oppur- tunity -on remand- to definatively explain the expressive nature of it's own factual finding on page five(5) of the appendix marked as B.(see lines 20-23). V. CONCLUSION 1 Washington tenders that the above enlisted objections in the instant case, as the District Court's determination for dismissal are clearly erroneous and do`` not line up with the jurisprudence of the State of Texas [or] the United States Constitution. (2)~ PRAYER FOR REL IEF (A) Washington prays that this Honorable Court would hold his habeas corpus writ application in Abeyance and Remand his cause back to the trial court for further proceedings. Washington feels that a [h]earing will help adequately resolve the constitutional aspects which are associated with the factual allegation(s) inside of his habeas application. (B) Washington prays that as a matter of law, he can obtain a merits review on his claim of constitutional error under the Federal Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment/ 'which has "clearly" resulted in him being convicted of a crime that he is [act]ually innocent of. (3). UNSWORN INMATE DEC LARAT ION I declare (or certify) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and that the Applicant's objections to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal of his writ application was placed in the unit mailing system on this the 3rd day of 'July 2015. Respectfully Submitted, ADOMHSWNHTS WNIHNGKW 899 F.M. 632 CONNALLY UNIT KENEDY, TEXAS 78119 TDCJ-ID4#1059435 (Pro Se) (4).
Document Info
Docket Number: WR-68,426-04
Filed Date: 7/8/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/29/2016