Washington, Adonis W. AKA Washington, Adonis ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • . - l m ;UZU ~‘OL!
    [COVER LETTER]
    Dear Clerk: Enclosed you will find my (Pro Se) objections
    to the Trial Court's Order recommending dismissal of my sub-
    sequent writ application. Will you please file these documents
    and bring them to the attention of the Honorable Judges of
    the court. I thank you for your assistance with this matter.
    RECENE» lN
    C©uRT oF ch.alNAL APPEALS
    JUL 08 2015
    Abe!A@oSie,CBezk
    DATE: July 3rd/2015
    899 F.M. 632 CONNALLY UNIT
    KENEDY, TEXAS 78119*
    (Pro Se)
    §R§¢QENE® z!N
    `` @§UWF @ig @MQWIEWM, H*PPEAL§
    §UL 98 Z@?‘§
    l No . 2001-cR-1015-w3 AD@!AQ@S‘€Q,CH@YK
    Ex PARTE ‘ § IN THE DISTRICT coURT
    ‘»./\ § 175TH JUDICIAL bISTRIcT-
    ADoNIS wAREEs wASHINGToN § BEXAR coUNTY, TExAs
    APPLICANT'S OBJECTION(S) TO THE HABEAS COURT'S
    ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF HIS SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE/JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
    Comes now, Adonis Warees Washington, Applicant in the above
    styled and numbered cause and files this his written object~
    ion(s) to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal
    of his subsequent application under § ll.O7 4(a). These object-
    ions are brought forth pursuant to Tex. C.C.P. art's ll.lO/
    ll.49, 39.05 and Tex. R. App. P. Rule(s) 10 et seq., 33.1 et
    seq. and 38.7.
    I.
    The Applicant (Washington) now presents the following
    objections to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal
    of his subsequent application under § ll.O7 4(a)(2), and for
    good cause presents the following:
    II.
    Washington petitions this Honorable Court to hold his §
    ll.O7 habeas corpus writ application in [A]beyance and remand
    this cause back to the trial court for a hearing to resolve
    the interpretation of a [f]actual .finding that the culpable
    mental state associated with his conviction for [intent]ional
    (l).
    murder was never established by the evidence presented at
    his trial. The nature of this statement in conjunction with
    the allegations of fact inside of Washington's subsequent
    writ application "clearly" make a prima facie actual innocence
    claim showing that by a preponderance of the evidence/ but
    for a violation of the United States Constitutionj [no] rational
    juror could have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
    Tex. Code. Crim. Proc. art. ll.07 § 4(a)(2).
    The trial court(i.e., Judge Mary Roman) has recently con~
    tested both the actual and constitutional nature of it's pre-
    vious factual finding that the record evidence(in Washington's
    cause) [does not show] that the shooting in his case was intent-
    ional. Washington asks at the very least, that the same court
    which issued this exonerative statement, be given an oppur-
    tunity -on remand- to definatively explain the expressive
    nature of it's own factual finding on page five(5) of the
    appendix marked as B.(see lines 20-23).
    V.
    CONCLUSION
    1
    Washington tenders that the above enlisted objections in
    the instant case, as the District Court's determination for
    dismissal are clearly erroneous and do`` not line up with the
    jurisprudence of the State of Texas [or] the United States
    Constitution.
    (2)~
    PRAYER FOR REL IEF
    (A) Washington prays that this Honorable Court would hold
    his habeas corpus writ application in Abeyance and Remand
    his cause back to the trial court for further proceedings.
    Washington feels that a [h]earing will help adequately resolve
    the constitutional aspects which are associated with the
    factual allegation(s) inside of his habeas application.
    (B) Washington prays that as a matter of law, he can obtain
    a merits review on his claim of constitutional error under
    the Federal Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment/
    'which has "clearly" resulted in him being convicted of a crime
    that he is [act]ually innocent of.
    (3).
    UNSWORN INMATE DEC LARAT ION
    I declare (or certify) under the penalty of perjury that
    the foregoing is true and correct, and that the Applicant's
    objections to the Habeas Court's Order recommending dismissal
    of his writ application was placed in the unit mailing system
    on this the 3rd day of 'July 2015.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    ADOMHSWNHTS WNIHNGKW
    899 F.M. 632 CONNALLY UNIT
    KENEDY, TEXAS 78119
    TDCJ-ID4#1059435 (Pro Se)
    (4).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-68,426-04

Filed Date: 7/8/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016