Texas Pharmomedical Exports Inc. v. Michelle T. Wang, Individually and D/B/A Wang & Company CPA's and Wang G.P. Inc. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August
    20, 2019.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-19-00450-CV
    TEXAS PHARMOMEDICAL EXPORTS INC., Appellant
    V.
    MICHELLE T. WANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A WANG &
    COMPANY CPA'S AND WANG G.P. INC., Appellees
    On Appeal from the 333rd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2015-52001
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This is an appeal from a judgment purporting to be a final summary
    judgment signed May 10, 2019. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal of the
    May 10, 2019 judgment.
    On June 18, 2019, in response to a timely-filed motion for reconsideration,
    the trial court vacated its May 10, 2019 judgment and signed an “interlocutory
    summary judgment.” The June 18, 2019 summary judgment disposed of some but
    not all claims in the lawsuit. Appellant filed a motion in this court requesting that
    we “return jurisdiction of this case to trial court,” given that the trial court vacated
    the May 10, 2019 judgment that prompted this appeal. We construe appellant’s
    motion as a motion to dismiss and grant appellant’s motion because we lack
    jurisdiction over the June 18, 2019 interlocutory summary judgment.
    Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har
    Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001). When judgments do not dispose of all
    pending parties and claims, they remain interlocutory and unappealable until a
    final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness
    Corp. v. Jackson, 
    53 S.W.3d 352
    , 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v.
    Tipps, 
    842 S.W.2d 266
    , 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Here, the trial court’s
    June 18, 2019 interlocutory summary judgment does not dispose of all claims of all
    parties. Our record otherwise contains no appealable final judgment, and no
    statutory exception applies. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction, and we order this
    appeal dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-19-00450-CV

Filed Date: 8/20/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/20/2019