Walter Allen Setzco v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                   IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-22-00301-CR
    WALTER ALLEN SETZCO,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law
    Navarro County, Texas
    Trial Court No. C41104-CR
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Walter Allen Setzco, was convicted by a jury of the offense of assault
    family violence with a prior conviction. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(2)(A). The
    trial court certified Setzco’s right of appeal and, on May 9, 2022, signed the judgment of
    conviction. More than four months later, on September 13, 2022, Setzco filed his notice
    of appeal challenging his May 9, 2022 conviction. Setzco included with his notice of
    appeal a “Motion for Permission for Out of Time Appeal.”
    In his “Motion for Permission for Out of Time Appeal,” Setzco recognizes that his
    notice of appeal is untimely and requests that this Court grant him an out-of-time appeal.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (“The notice of appeal must be filed . . . within 30 days after
    the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court
    enters an appealable order.”); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
    (“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction). We
    lack original habeas-corpus jurisdiction and, thus, have no authority to grant an out-of-
    time appeal. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    , 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)
    (explaining that an application for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas
    Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions); Parr
    v. State, 
    206 S.W.3d 143
    , 144-45 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.); Ashorn v. State, 
    77 S.W.3d 405
    , 409 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d); see also Ex parte Sanders, No. 05-
    20-00729-CR, 
    2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 2253
    , at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 24, 2021, no pet.)
    (mem. op., not designated for publication).
    Accordingly, we dismiss Setzco’s appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    STEVE SMITH
    Justice
    Setzco v. State                                                                         Page 2
    Before Chief Justice Gray
    Justice Johnson, and
    Justice Smith
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2022
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    Setzco v. State                                  Page 3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-22-00301-CR

Filed Date: 9/21/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/23/2022