Charles Blake Defore v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                    ACCEPTED
    12-15-00075-CR
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    10/16/2015 12:23:15 PM
    Pam Estes
    CLERK
    ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
    CAUSE NO. NO. 12-15-00075-CR                 FILED IN
    12th COURT OF APPEALS
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN THE                      10/16/2015 12:23:15 PM
    COURT OF APPEALS                         PAM ESTES
    TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS                     Clerk
    TYLER, TEXAS
    __________________________________________________________________
    CHARLES BLAKE DEFORE,
    Appellant
    VS.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    Appeal in Cause No. 31077
    On Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court
    of Anderson County, Texas
    __________________________________________________________________
    BRIEF FOR STATE
    __________________________________________________________________
    Scott C. Holden
    1st Asst. Criminal District Attorney
    Anderson County, Texas
    Anderson County Courthouse
    Palestine, Texas 75801
    Texas Bar No. #24036795
    903/723-7400
    i
    IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL
    JUDGE PRESIDING:
    THE HONORABLE BASCOM W. BENTLEY III
    DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:
    CHARLES BLAKE DEFORE
    FOR THE DEFENDANT:
    APPELLATE ATTORNEY
    COLIN MCFALL
    513 N. CHURCH ST.
    PALESTINE, TEXAS 75801
    TRIAL COUNSEL
    JEFF HERRINGTON
    509 N. CHURCH ST.
    PALESTINE, TX 75801
    FOR THE STATE:
    SCOTT C. HOLDEN
    1ST ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    ANDERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE
    500 N. CHURCH STREET, RM. 38
    PALESTINE, TX 75801
    sholden@co.anderson.tx.us
    (903) 723-7400
    ii
    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    PAGE
    Identity of Parties and Counsel .     .         .   .   .   .   .   ii
    Table of Contents .      .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   iii
    Index of Authorities     .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   iv
    Statement of the Case    .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   1
    Issues Presented   .     .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   1
    Statement of Facts .     .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   1
    Summary of Argument .           .     .         .   .   .   .   .   2
    State’s Reply to Appellant’s Point of Error 1       .   .   .   .   2-4
    Prayer       .     .     .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   5
    Certificate of Service   .      .     .         .   .   .   .   .   6
    Certificate of Word Count       .     .         .   .   .   .   .   6
    iii
    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
    Cases                                                                    Page
    Jones v. State, 
    795 S.W.2d 199
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)         .   .      3
    Parks v. State, 
    960 S.W.2d 234
    (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref'd)
    .     .     .      .    .    .     .     .    .     .      .     .      3
    Villela v. State, 
    564 S.W.2d 750
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)       .   .      2,3
    Statutes and Rules
    Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.34(a).     .        .   .       .   .   .     4
    Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.09(c).     .        .   .       .   .   .     4
    iv
    STATEMENT OF THE CASE
    The Statement of the case is as stated in appellant’s brief page 6. The
    Reporter’s Record will be referred to as “V1, V2, etc.” unless otherwise
    noted.     The Clerk’s Record will be referred to as “CR1” or “CR2”.
    Appellant’s Brief will be referred to as “AB” unless otherwise noted.
    Appellee is referred to as “State”.
    ISSUES PRESENTED
    POINT OF ERROR 1:
    Appellant contends the trial court failed to adjudicate appellant guilty
    prior to sentence rendering the judgment void.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    Are as stated in Appellant’s brief.
    -1-
    SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
    POINT OF ERROR 1 RESTATED:
    Appellant contends the trial court failed to adjudicate appellant guilty
    prior to sentence rendering the judgment void.
    ARGUMENT
    The court memorializing the sentence in the written judgment and the
    finding appellant guilty is sufficient.
    STATE’S REPLY TO APPELLANT’S POINT OF ERROR:
    When the trial court conducts a hearing on the adjudication of guilt
    and then holds the assessment of punishment in abeyance and orders a
    presentence investigation, the court necessarily implies that it has found the
    defendant guilty. Villela v. State, 
    564 S.W.2d 750
    , 751 (Tex. Crim. App.
    1978). The court of criminal appeals has observed that beyond the
    pronouncement of sentence "no further ritual or special incantation from the
    bench is necessary to accomplish an adjudication of guilt." Jones v. State,
    
    795 S.W.2d 199
    , 201 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Further, a written judgment
    is valid even in the absence of an express oral pronouncement of guilt by the
    -2-
    trial court. Parks v. State, 
    960 S.W.2d 234
    , 238 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st
    Dist.] 1997, pet. ref'd) (citing Villela v. State, 
    564 S.W.2d 750
    , 751 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1978)).
    In the case at bar, the trial court held hearings on both cause numbers
    31070 and 31077 at the same time. Witnesses testified to the facts alleged in
    both motions to adjudicate and at the conclusion of the hearings. At the
    conclusion of the motion to adjudicate hearing the trial court affirmatively
    stated, “I find the allegations, including the allegation of failure to report the
    arrest, to be true. All the allegations as amended from the testimony are
    granted.” (V2, P28, L17-20)          Clearly granting the State’s Motions to
    Adjudicate.
    The trial court then stated:
    In Cause Number 31,077, the Court hereby finds and
    adjudges you guilty as charged of the offense of manufacture
    and delivery of a controlled substance.
    Now, folks, what about Count 2? I didn't -- I didn't
    address Count 2. I grant the motion as to Count 2. The
    evidence was sufficient to support it, as well. Same and all
    shall be the order and judgment of this Court. So ordered.
    (V2, P28-29, L21-7)
    -3-
    This is show later in the sentencing hearing the court pronounced “All right.
    Having found and adjudged you guilty in both of these causes, I hereby
    assess your punishment in both causes to 30 years in the Institutional
    Division of the Texas Department of Corrections.” (V2, P36, L6-10) and the
    judgment in this cause reflects the appellant was sentenced to 30 years.
    (CR127) as does the docket sheet. (CR130)
    The trial court clearly adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced
    him to 30 years TDCJ. However, Count 2, Tampering with Evidence has a
    sentencing range of 2 to 10 years in TDCJ. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §
    37.09(c); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.34(a). As it is unclear what sentence
    the trial court gave the defendant in Count 2, this Court should remand the
    case back down to the trial court for a pronouncement of sentence within the
    punishment range of Count 2.
    -4-
    PRAYER
    WHEREFORE the Appellee prays that the Court upon consideration
    hereof affirm the decision of the Trial Court as to adjudication and remand
    the case to the trial court for sentencing within the proper punishment range.
    Respectfully submitted by,
    SCOTT C. HOLDEN
    1st Asst. Criminal District Attorney
    Anderson County, Texas
    Anderson County Courthouse
    500 N. Church Street, RM 38
    Palestine, Texas 75801
    Texas Bar No. #24036795
    (903)723-7400
    -5-
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Brief for the State
    has been delivered via fax/email to: Colin McFall on this the 16th day of
    October, 2015, in accordance with the provisions of the Texas Rules of
    Criminal and Appellate Procedure.
    ___________________________________
    SCOTT C. HOLDEN, 1ST ASSISTANT
    CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT
    I also certify that the entire word count of the State’s reply brief is 1118
    words.
    ___________________________________
    SCOTT C. HOLDEN, 1ST ASSISTANT
    CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    -6-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00075-CR

Filed Date: 10/16/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016