Cornelis P. Willig v. Marcela Gutierrez Diaz ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                                ACCEPTED
    01-15-00073-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/9/2015 9:59:26 AM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    NO.Ol-15-00073-CV
    FILED IN
    IN THE MATTER OF                                   §                 IN THE 1st
    FIRST  COURT
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THE MARRIAGE OF                                    §                            HOUSTON, TEXAS
    §                        7/9/2015 9:59:26 AM
    CORNELIS      P. WILLIG                            §                        CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    OF APPEALS
    AND                                                §                                Clerk
    l\fARCELA     GUTIERREZ         DIAZ               §                 HOUSTON,       TEXAS
    APPELLANT CORNELIS P. 'WILLIG'S
    MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE A CORRECTED                              BRIEF
    Appellant Cornelis P. Willig hereby asks the Court to grant this Motion allowing the
    Appellant to file a corrected brief in the appeal of this case so that the brief filed by the Appellant
    can include the one page that was accidentally omitted and not included in the brieftha1 was filed.
    A. Introduction
    1.     Appellant's attorney inadvertently omitted including in the brief that was timely efiled with
    the Court the inclusion of what should have been the true third page of the brief s Statement
    of Facts. Appellant's   attorney could not overcome the electronic barriers that the word
    processor used in preventing the attorney from numbering the pages of the brief from the
    beginning of the section as the Statement of Facts to the end .ofthe brief itself
    2.      For that reason, Appellant's attorney took the brief to the First Court of Appeals showing the
    lack of numeration from that point in the brief to its conclusion and presented ti an assistant
    of the Court at the Intake station. The Intake Staff at the Court advised Appellant's attorney
    that it was permissible and would not harm the brief to hand number those pages since the
    attorney had not been able to have the computer do so because of reasons that to this
    moment, the attorney does not comprehend, even with the assistance of his legal secretary
    and her experience.
    3.   Appellant's attorney returned to his office and started to hand number the referenced pages.
    Somehow, in the process of numbering the pages, the page that should have been page
    number 3 was separated from the other pages and was not included in the brief. Presently
    numbered as page 3 is what should have been, if the numeration would have been properLy
    done, page 4. Page 3 was omitted from the numeration, not included in the brief when filed,
    and the remaining subsequent pages of the brief all reflect being one page off from what
    should have been the proper page number if page 3 would have been included in the
    contents.
    4.   The filed brief does not include the contents of page 3 at the present time and all subsequent
    pages reflect a page number that is one page off from the contents of the brief as written. The
    contents of that page are of importance to the concepts that were presented in the brief and
    there is now a gap in the presentation of the concepts in the Statement of Facts because of
    the omission of page 3.
    4.   Appellant's attorney was extremely careful in consolidating the brief and took much care in
    attempting to insure that a mistake such as this would not happen. Somehow, for some
    reason or act that Appellant's attorney is not aware of, the error occurred, for which error
    Appellant's attorney apologizes to the Court.
    B. Prayer
    6.   For these reasons, Appellant asks the leave of the Court requesting that the Court grant
    Appellant the filing of the brief as a corrected brief, this time fully including in the filed
    document the missing page 3 and the full content that should have been correctly flied with
    2
    the Court originally. Appellant also requests that the Court permit Appellant to make a
    correction in the repagination of the brief to correctly reflect the true location of the complete
    contents of the brief once page 3 is included.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    ~"\-
    ~ P eJl.-.-J}
    Andres P. Chaumont
    State Bar No.: 15779400
    834 Fleetwood Place
    Houston" Texas 77079
    Tel: (281) 493-3999
    Fax: (281) 493-3993
    Email: anchlaw88@gmail.com
    Attorney for Appellant
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of Appellant's Motion for Leave of Court to File a Corrected Brief was
    served on Appellee's counsel of record, Mr. Michael Busby, 2909 Hillcroft, Suite 350, Houston,
    Texas    77057; Fax: 713-974-1181 by telephonic documenttransfer           to said fax number on July 9,
    2015.
    JJLc......p.~
    Andres P_Chaumont
    Attorney for Appellant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00073-CV

Filed Date: 7/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016