Christopher Early v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    August 27, 2019
    No. 04-19-00565-CV
    Christopher EARLY,
    Appellant
    v.
    TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,
    Appellee
    From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 17-07-0426-CVW
    Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On August 7, 2019, appellant filed a notice of appeal stating his intention to appeal a
    judgment he states was signed on August 7, 2019, in trial court cause number 17-07-0426-CVW.
    On August 21, 2019, the trial court clerk filed a copy of appellant’s notice of appeal in this court
    with a copy of a final judgment signed in the underlying cause on January 30, 2019. On August
    23, 2019, appellee filed a letter questioning this court’s jurisdiction to consider appellant’s
    appeal, noting the final judgment was signed on January 30, 2019, and the notice of appeal was
    filed six months after the final judgment was signed. Also on August 23, 2019, the trial court
    clerk filed a notification of late record asserting the notice of appeal was not timely filed and
    stating appellant has failed to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record.
    Although a notice of appeal generally is required to be filed within thirty days after a
    final judgment is signed, a restricted appeal must be filed within six months after the judgment is
    signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; see also Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997)
    (holding a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good
    faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day
    grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time). The final
    judgment signed by the trial court grants the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. “[W]hen
    a party neither files a response nor appears at the hearing on a summary judgment motion, a
    restricted appeal is permissible.” Samples v. Dall. Cty. Special Civil Serv. Comm'n, No. 05-14-
    00920-CV, 
    2015 WL 7873720
    , at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 4, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.).
    In the absence of a clerk’s record, this court cannot determine whether appellant’s notice
    of appeal was timely filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this
    court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or
    arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without
    paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be
    dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
    _________________________________
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 27th day of August, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00565-CV

Filed Date: 8/27/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/29/2019