Mikey Albert Lopez v. State ( 2016 )

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed November 30, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00103-CR
MIKEY ALBERT LOPEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F15-54865-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Lang
Mikey Albert Lopez waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a
deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). After finding appellant
guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s
attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.
The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief
presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable
grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.]
1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to
file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,
319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders
cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Douglas S. Lang/
DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
160103F.U05
–2–
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
MIKEY ALBERT LOPEZ, Appellant On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-16-00103-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-54865-R.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Brown and Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 30th day of November, 2016.
–3–