Justin Jones v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •               NUMBERS 13-19-00134-CR AND 13-19-00135-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    JUSTIN JONES,                                                             APPELLANT,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                               APPELLEE.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 214th District Court
    of Nueces County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria
    Order Per Curiam
    Appellant, Justin Jones, filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction
    in trial court cause numbers 18FC-4767F and 18FC-2391F.                  The trial court's
    certifications of the defendant's right to appeal show that the defendant does not have the
    right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
    This cause is before the Court on appellant’s agreed motion to abate the appeal
    for factual determination. According to the motion, there is no plea agreement in the file
    and the transcript of both the plea colloquy and the sentencing hearing specifically state
    that there was no plea agreement and that this case involved an open plea.              Both
    certifications of the right to appeal state that appellant does not have the right to appeal
    because this was a plea bargain case, which is contrary to the record.
    Since the appellate record has been filed, we are obligated to review the record to
    determine whether the trial court's certification of appellant's right of appeal is defective
    and, if so, to obtain another certification from the trial court. Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c); 37.1. A defective
    certification includes a certification that is correct in form, but, when compared with the
    record before the court, proves to be inaccurate. 
    Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614
    .
    Because of the ambiguity of the record and certification, we GRANT appellant’s
    agreed motion and ABATE and REMAND this case to the trial court for a factual
    determination as to whether appellant has the right to appeal and for re-certification of
    appellant's right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), 44.3, 44.4; 
    Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614
    .
    On remand, the trial court shall immediately issue notice of a hearing and
    accordingly conduct a hearing addressing the foregoing matter. We further direct that,
    after conducting the hearing, the trial court re-certify whether appellant has the right of
    appeal. The trial court's amended certification, and any orders it enters shall be included
    in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court is directed to cause the supplemental
    2
    clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this
    order. Should the trial court require more time to comply with the directions of this Court,
    it shall request an extension prior to the expiration of this deadline.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed this the
    19th day of August, 2019.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-19-00134-CR

Filed Date: 8/19/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/22/2019