Bolivar, Ex Parte Randall ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                           PD-0617-15
    Randall Bolivar # 1719379
    Ellis Unit
    1697 FM 980
    Huntsville/ Texas 77343
    June 23,   2015
    Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station
    lD)£fo£lD oao/ ±o/3 /lib?
    Austin, Texas 78711
    RE: Cause No. PD-0617-15
    Dear Clerk of the Court:
    Enclosed for filing with the Court, please find my SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE
    TO FILE OUT OF TlMEPDR OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL DUE TO JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT.
    Thank you for your time and efforts. God Bless You!.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    Randall Bolivar, Pro Se
    cc:
    State Prosecuting Attorney
    Cameron County D.A.'s Office                                    FILED IN
    File                                                    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    JUL 0? 20i5
    Abel Acosta, Clerk
    RECEIVED IN
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    JUL 07 2015
    Abel Acosta, Clerk
    RECEIVED IN
    CAUSE NO. PD-0617-15
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL!
    JUL 07 101!
    IN THE
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS                     AS&dS/lfO
    AUSTIN,   TEXAS
    RANDALL BOLIVAR,                         §
    Petitioner                           §      COA NO. 13-11-00397-CR
    §      13TH Court of Appeals
    vs.                                      §
    §      Tr. Ct. No. 09-CR-2869-A
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                      §      107TH District Court
    Respondent                         §
    SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OUT OF TIME PDR OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
    DUE TO JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF' THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:
    Comes now Randall Bolivar, Petitioner Pro Se, and respectfully moves the
    Court to grant him leave to file an out of time Petition for Discretionary
    Review (PDR) in the Court of Criminal Appeals, and support shows:
    FACTS
    1. Appellant filed a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus, and a hearing was held
    June 14, 2011 in the 107TH District Court of Cameron County, Texas. (RR-I6)
    2. The trial court denied the requested relief, and an interlocutory appeal
    ensued. (Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Cause No. 13-11-00397-CR)
    3. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals delivered a published opinion, by Justice
    Gregory T. Perkes, on November 1, 2012. The case is cited as EX PARTE
    RANDALL BOLIVAR, 
    386 S.W.3d 338
    (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2012).
    4. Appellate counsel wrote Appellant on November 3, 2012 to notify Appellant
    of the appellate court's affirmation, but did not advise Petitioner of his
    rights to petition this Court for discretionary review. (Exhibit Attached).
    5. Appellant first became aware of his rignt to aPDR in the instant case on
    May 11, 2015 while reviewing the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedures in
    anticipation of having to respond to any brief or objection filed by the
    State in response to the Writ of Mandamus and Stay of Proceedings filed by
    Petitioner in this Court. (Cause No. WR-79,354-03).
    6. Appellant has never received the trial court's order of denial, nor has the
    trial court's Clerk's Record been made available to Appellant. Just recently
    has Appellate counsel made the Appellate Brief and State's Brief.
    7. Appellant has never been appraised of his rights under Rule 68, TRAP, as
    required under Rule 48.4, TRAP. Appellate Court's record supports his claim.
    ARGUMENT
    Appellant argues due to interlocutory Appellate Counsel, Luis P. Garcia and
    Lisa G. Greenberg, failing to inform Appellant that he had fifteen (15) days to
    file either a motion for extension of time to file PDR, or to file the PDR
    proper, pursuant to Rule 68, TRAP, as shown in the attached Exhibit. (JPAY
    letter from Lisa G. Greenberg).
    Garcia and Greenberg have a duty as appellate counsel to notify Appellant of
    his time limits to file the motion for extension or PDR proper, in which both
    attorneys failed to do soand follow Rule 48.4, TRAP, requirements in sending
    Appellant, via Certified Mail, notice of the Court of Appeals opinion and that
    Appellant must file said motion for extension or PDR, see 
    id. Because Appellate
    Counsel failed to notify Appellant of TRAP Rule 68
    requirements to file for an extension or PDR, this Court has repeatedly held
    as precedent in the past that Appellant should be granted leave to file a PDR
    due to an appellate counsel's failure to notify. This reasoning is also in line
    "with the rule that defendants have a right to effective assistance of counsel
    on appeal." LAFLER v. COOPER, 
    132 S. Ct. 1376
    , 1385 (2012). Appellate Counsel's
    duties on appeal continue until Rule 48.4 has been executed by counsel.
    Appellant's interlocutory appeal addressed a separate conviction from the
    I05TH District Court of Kleberg County, Texas (Cause No. 06-CRF-0501) other
    than the 107TH District Court of Cameron County, Texas (Cause No. 09-CR-2869-A),
    conviction in wnich the Kleberg Court, prior to the Cameron County Murder trial,
    found that as to Count I to the Kleberg Motion To Revoke of the same Cameron
    County murder allegation to be "NOT TRUE," therein divesting Cameron County of
    JURISDICTION/ which cannot be waived, and can be brought forth at any time, in
    any court. See EX PARTE PATTERSON, 
    969 S.W.2d 16
    , 19 (CCA 1998); HOUSTON GEN.
    INS. CO. v. ATER, 
    843 S.W.2d 225
    , 227 (Tex. App. El Paso 1992).
    Therefore, by this Court's prior denial of leave to file out of time PDR
    was in ercorcreating a fundamental constitutional violation of significant
    magnitude due to jurisdictional issue.
    PRAYER
    Wherefore, premises considered, Petitioner prays this Honorable Court will
    grant leave to file an out of time PDR in Cause No. 13-11-00397-CR, from the
    Thirteenth Court of Appeals.
    Respectfully Submitted,
    Randall Bolivar, Pro Se
    Petitioner
    Ellis Unit, TDCJ # 1719379
    1697 FM 980
    Huntsville, Texas 77343
    VERIFICATION
    STATE OF TEXAS
    COUNTY OF WALKER
    AAFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
    SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OUT OF TIME PDR OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
    DUE TO JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT
    I, Randall Bolivar, being presently incarcerated within TDCJ-CID, O.B. Ellis
    Unit, located in Walker County, Texas, declare under penalty of perjury without
    the United Statesa that I have read the above-noted motion, that every
    allegation and fact stated therin and herewith are true, correct, and complete
    pursuant to Title 28 DSC § 1746 (1).
    EXECUTED ON June 23, 2015.
    Randall Bolivar, Affiant
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, Maria S. Rey, certify that a true and correct copy of the above and fore
    going document has been served on opposing counsel for the State via hand-
    delivery, fax, or regular First Class Mail at:
    Cameron County D.A.'s Office                       State Prosecuting Attorney
    964 E.   Harrison St.                  AND         P.O.   Box.13046
    Brownsville, Texas 78520                           /Austin, Texas l$]l±.
    Signed and served on June   X£>,   2015.
    RANDALL BOLIVAR 01719379 ML 8J21 30 ID:43334950 rp Iffl
    You have received aJfmy letter, the fastest way t ^ ^ T
    From : Lisa Greenberg, CustomerlD: 4074939
    To (Inmate): RANDALL BOLIVAR, ID: 01719379
    Date: 11/3/2012 10:04:15 AM EST,     Letter ID: 43334950
    Location : ML
    Confidential and Privileged
    Attorney/Client Communication
    Unauthorized persons are prohibited from viewina or usi™ th,c r.       • *•   •
    message and are not the intended recip'LnT Lase^contact mTimmf^?'," any,Way' ,f V™ h^e received this
    message without saving, printing, or forwarding it                 S ,mmed,ate|y and then immediately delete the
    Hi Randall,
    A~ed^pS"""                                                                             news. The 13th Court 0(
    level They said that because Trey GaSa did notarrS SI « , ^ ,haln,° *•* MnS" "as made at the tn'al court
    did argue findings of fact were made           n9U° "lal al tnal °°urt teve;.' «"« »°< argue that in my appetu
    Siller °' abunch -Repubto-oi ^ r»:ssssrra„setoTo,rtad
    Here are some important portions of the opinion:
    ^Stct"^
    essential eiements ofLoffense intX selESSy useT                          "^cout must determine
    mS°™"i<>   <***^ K 1) exactivwha,
    »
    —X^n"
    preserved for our review because appelian,did no,^m%^S3"£g£. «- «*
    ~W>£ttE^:X£^T^
    make any additional findings regarding the othJnXoSfiTiSnoTSSJ ^"^"*"»    "« for,he
    Unnece5sary »*• ««
    "•—ooIrtS
    -here
    OKay, so there „Is. Hopefuliy, you have a,„, copy „,the opinion from ,h. ,»courtofappeais
    mgoing to give you some time to diqest this a<; Itrv* Q,*«   *
    Iam going to be completely frank wfh you hert Sis wi°T *"•£%"*' 3nd then we ™* move forward
    Trust me, Iknow how hard the financial sit.,ifinn h if n,tS to w,thdrawal from your case due to lar*rif I™
    to appeal this case to the Court: 1™SSSL?iT for y°U and yourfami|y- ^ Sd^bW fees 2T£S
    alone. Ineed Luis's experience ^ZZmat^ his'Slri? ^hheDCase- bui' don,t feel c™SS*doing so
    we could try to get appointed to the murdeTeas, bl? £2W T B,i°wnSVil,e- If there is no money avaSte
    appointment. Pate did appoint us to your other cases thogh        "^ ""^ 3S y^took T^ Qara S?rf hb
    """.^fe^te^
    RANDALL BOLIVAR 01719379 ML 8J21 30 ID:43334950 [P 2/2]
    Jfiay
    From : Lisa Greenberg, CustomerlD- 4074939
    To (Inmate): RANDALL BOLIVAR, ID- 01719379
    Sation'T12 1°:°4:15 *M EST' Letter ID: 4333495°
    Iwant to see this through as Iam committed to your case hut Iam =k-* ♦
    fee just as passionate about this case and the law as fdid thi rZ^ o.Ck between a rock and a hard place I,tni
    aTS^dV,?"
    Iwill await word from you.
    Thanks Randall, take care,
    Lisa
    fi^fe mdmmSy to y^t mm^com to mm
    

Document Info

Docket Number: PD-0617-15

Filed Date: 7/7/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016