Zackery Jamarcier Summage v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                 ACCEPTED
    06-14-00210-CR
    SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
    TEXARKANA, TEXAS
    7/6/2015 3:05:32 PM
    DEBBIE AUTREY
    CLERK
    No. 06-14-00210-CR
    ZACKERY JAMARCIER SUMMAGE,                 §          IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT
    FILED IN
    Appellant               §                    6th COURT OF APPEALS
    §                      TEXARKANA, TEXAS
    VS.                                        §          COURT OF A7/6/2015
    PPEALS  3:05:32 PM
    §                        DEBBIE AUTREY
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                        §                            Clerk
    Appellee        §          OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
    COUNSEL’S CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATIONS TO APPELLANT
    Appellant’s appellate counsel files this certification of action taken in this
    appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4.
    A. Introduction
    1.      Zackery Jamarcier Summage is the Appellant. The State of Texas is
    the Appellee.
    2.      Troy Hornsby ("counsel") was appointed to represent Appellant on
    Appellant’s first level appeals. Counsel was not appointed to present a Petition for
    Discretionary review on behalf of Appellant and no such right currently exists
    under Texas law.
    3.      The Sixth District Court of Appeals for the State of Texas,
    Texarkana, issued its opinions in this case on June 3, 2015, judgment was issued
    on the same day. Thus, this court has finally resolved this appeal by issuing its
    opinions in this appeal.
    4.      Appellate counsel has fully carried out his duties in pursing a first
    level appeal as appointed by the trial court.
    5.      Appellate counsel has found no reasonable basis for a motion for
    rehearing.
    6.     Therefore, appellate counsel’s representation of Appellant is
    complete.
    B. Counsel’s Action
    7.     The same day that counsel received this court’s opinion and judgment
    in this case, counsel directed correspondence to the Appellant by both U.S. Postal
    Service first class mail and by U.S. Postal Service certified mail, return receipt
    requested, at Appellant’s last known address. The U.S. Postal Service first class
    mail letter was not returned and presumed received. Additionally, counsel has not
    received the executed return receipt for the certified mail.
    8.     In that correspondence, Appellant’s appellate counsel informed the
    Appellant of Appellant’s available option for filing a Motion for Rehearing with
    the Court of Appeals. Counsel explained the procedure for filing such a Motion
    for Rehearing including the deadlines therefor and referred Appellant to the
    applicable rule of appellate procedure. However, counsel informed Appellant that
    counsel was unable to locate any arguable grounds for such motion and, therefore,
    counsel would not file such motion on Appellant’s behalf because it would be
    frivolous.
    9.     Additionally, in that correspondence, Appellant’s appellate counsel
    informed the Appellant of Appellant’s available option for filing a Petition for
    Discretionary Review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Counsel
    explained the procedure including the deadline therefor and referred Appellant to
    the applicable rule of appellate procedure. However, counsel informed Appellant
    that Pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art 1.051(d)(1), the Texas
    Constitution and the United States Constitution Appellant is entitled to a state-
    appointed attorney only through an appeal of the first level and referenced
    applicable case law. Therefore, counsel explained that he would not be filing a
    petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
    However, counsel informed Appellant of the applicable deadlines for filing such.
    Finally, counsel explained to Appellant that should the Court of Criminal Appeals
    grant discretionary review Appellant would then be entitled to appointed counsel
    and referenced applicable law.
    10.    Finally, Appellant’s appellate counsel informed Appellant that
    counsel would continue to represent Appellant until such time as this court issued
    its mandate, at which time counsel’s representation of Appellant would end.
    However, counsel informed Appellant that counsel was still available to answer
    any questions Appellant had.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Miller, James, Miller & Hornsby, L.L.P.
    By:________________________________
    Troy Hornsby
    Texas State Bar Number 00790919
    1725 Galleria Oaks Drive
    Texarkana, Texas 75503
    troy.hornsby@gmail.com
    903.794.2711; f. 903.792.1276
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    This is to certify that on July 6, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing Counsel’s Certification of Notifications to Appellant has been forwarded
    by U.S. mail on all counsel of record listed below.
    Appellant                                   State's Attorney
    Zackery Summage                             Coke Solomon
    3157 Woodlawn Avenue                        Shawn Connally
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71104                 Harrison County District Attorney
    P. O. Box 776
    Trial Court Judge                           Marshall, Texas 75671-0776
    Honorable Brad Morin
    71st Judicial District Court
    Harrison County Courthouse
    200 West Houston, Suite 219
    Marshall, Texas 75670
    _______________________
    Troy Hornsby
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-14-00210-CR

Filed Date: 7/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016