Omar Ibrahim v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                          ACCEPTED
    01-14-00785-CR
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/6/2015 9:03:51 AM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    No. 01-14-00785-CR
    In the                    FILED IN
    1st COURT OF APPEALS
    Court of Appeals             HOUSTON, TEXAS
    For the             7/6/2015 9:03:51 AM
    First District of Texas    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    At Houston
    
    No. 1362139
    In the 178th District Court
    Of Harris County, Texas
    
    OMAR IBRAHIM
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS
    Appellee
    
    STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
    OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF
    
    To the Honorable Court of Appeals:
    The State of Texas, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 2 and
    10.5, moves for an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief. The
    following facts are relevant:
    1. The appellant was indicted for murder. Appellant pled not guilty, but a
    jury found him guilty of the charged offense. The jury assessed
    sentence at 99 years confinement in the Texas Department of
    Criminal Justice. Appellant filed timely notice of appeal.
    2. Appellant filed an appellate brief on April 17, 2015.
    3. The State’s appellate brief is due on July 6, 2015.
    4. This is the State’s second request for an extension in this case.
    5. The State requests this extension of time in which to file its brief, and
    the undersigned attorney believes that a brief can be filed by August
    28, 2015. The undersigned requests a lengthier than usual extension
    for the reasons addressed below and in an attempt to realistically
    estimate a date by which she anticipates having the brief filed.
    6. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for an
    extension of time to allow the State to file its brief:
    a. At present, the Harris County District Attorney’s Office
    employees 15 appellate prosecutors, but one is presently
    deployed on active military service and unable to carry a
    caseload, and the chief is often required to perform so many
    administrative tasks that he cannot carry a caseload.
    Accordingly, the remaining members of the appellate division
    are currently assigned a caseload of approximately 60 active
    cases showing an average of 4.6 briefs per prosecutor.
    b. The attorney to whom this case is assigned has four
    outstanding briefs assigned to her including this one. And she
    had to cease work on briefing for one week to prepare for oral
    argument on Earvin v. State, No. 14-14-00702-2-CR and 14-14-
    00703-CR.
    c. The undersigned was not assigned this brief until June 12,
    2015, after the original deadline had passed. Moreover, the
    State was unaware that appellant had filed his brief on April 17,
    2015, because as referenced in his first motion for extension, it
    did not receive a copy of appellant’s brief when filed. Having
    received the briefing assignment so late, and having already two
    cases that are more senior and for which briefs must be
    completed first, the State is requesting the longer than usual
    extension.
    d. Between the time that the appellant filed his brief in this case
    and this State’s motion for extension, the undersigned filed the
    following: a brief in Darby v. State, No. 14-14-00687-CR; a
    lengthy brief in Uvukansi v. State, No. 01-14-00527-CR; original
    and amended “State’s Proposed Findings of Fact and
    Conclusions of Law” in Penton v. State, No. 14-14-00406-CR; a
    brief in Penton, No. 14-14-00406-CR; a brief in Dorsey v. State,
    No. 14-14-00718-CR; a brief in Lopez v. State, No. 14-14-00312-
    CR, and she prepared a bench brief on a pending trial matter in
    State v. Alas, No. 1437254, which further slowed progress on
    the assigned cases.
    e. The undersigned was also been out of the county and unable to
    respond to briefs from June 5 through 11, 2015. Moreover, she
    will be out of the office on a scheduled absences from July 20-
    24, 2015, and August 3-5, 2015.
    f. The workload of this prosecutor is not out of the ordinary in
    the appellate division of the Harris County District Attorney’s
    Office.
    g. In addition to its assignments in responding to appellate briefs,
    the appellate division of the Harris County District Attorney’s
    Office also answers questions from trial prosecutors. These
    questions frequently occur in the middle of or immediately
    before trial, and therefore other work must be put aside to
    answer these pressing questions. Harris County has 25
    Criminal District Courts and 15 County Criminal Courts at Law,
    and this particular prosecutor is tasked with answering
    questions related to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article
    39.14 regarding discovery changes, is currently on the HCDA
    committee offering comments on the new e-file rules changes
    for criminal cases, is one of two prosecutors tasked with
    answering any juvenile law related questions, and answers
    questions from five felony courts in addition to the three
    juvenile courts.
    h. The Harris County District Attorney’s Office Appellate Division
    is experiencing a significant workload at present. Appellate
    prosecutors, including the undersigned attorney, are working as
    quickly as possible to complete as many briefs as possible as
    quickly as possible while still addressing all the issues raised by
    appellant’s as thoroughly as necessary to see that justice is
    done on each appeal. Accounting for varying staffing levels, the
    output of the division is not significantly different than it was
    this time last year. However, because of the high workload per
    prosecutor, as well as the greater length and complexity of
    appeals being brought in this county, it often takes longer to
    process all of the assigned cases, and more cases thereby
    require multiple extension or more lengthy extensions before
    the completion of each brief.
    WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested
    extension until August 28, 2015.
    Respectfully submitted,
    /s/ Jessica A. Caird
    JESSICA A. CAIRD
    Assistant District Attorney
    Harris County, Texas
    1201 Franklin, Suite 600
    Houston, Texas 77002-1923
    (713) 755-5826
    caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net
    TBC No. 24000608
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that I have requested that efile.txcourts.gov electronically serve a
    copy of this motion to:
    Marcus J. Fleming
    Attorney at Law
    9219 Katy Freeway, Ste. 220
    Houston, TX 77024
    mjfleminglawyer@sbcglobal.net
    /s/ Jessica A. Caird
    Jessica A. Caird
    Assistant District Attorney
    Harris County, Texas
    1201 Franklin, Suite 600
    Houston, Texas 77002-1923
    (713) 755-5826
    caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net
    TBC No. 24000608
    Date: July 6, 2015
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-14-00785-CR

Filed Date: 7/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016