Denbury Resources, Inc. and Denbury Onshore, LLC v. Gemini Insurance Company ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                                   ACCEPTED
    14-15-00041-CV
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    7/6/2015 9:56:49 AM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CARVER, DARDEN,                                                             CLERK
    KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN,
    BLOSSMAN & AREAUX LLC
    SARAH E. STOGNER                                                               FILED IN
    ASSOCIATE                                                            14th COURT OF APPEALS
    A                                                                                    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    (504) 585.3845
    stogner@carverdarden.com                                                   7/6/2015 9:56:49 AM
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    July 6, 2015
    Civil-Post Trial Division
    Harris County District Clerk
    Attn: Ms. Phyllis Washington, Post-Trial
    201 Caroline Street, Suite 250
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Re:        Gemini Insurance Company vs. Denbury Resources, Inc.
    Case No. 2012-10397, 270th Judicial District
    Appeal No. 14-15-00041-CV, 14th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Our File: 1782.18331
    Dear Ms. Washington:
    On April 23, 2015 we requested the Court supplement the record to include motions for
    summary judgment inadvertently omitted from the Clerk’s record to the 14th Circuit Court of
    Appeals in the above-captioned litigation. However, the exhibits attached to those motions are
    still missing from the record:
    1.         Exhibit “A” to Denbury’s Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of Its
    “Plugged and Abandoned” and “Due Diligence” No Evidence Motions for
    Summary Judgment (image number 62463542);
    2.         Exhibit “B” to Denbury’s Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of Its
    “Plugged and Abandoned” and “Due Diligence” No Evidence Motions for
    Summary Judgment (image number 62463543);
    3.         Exhibit “C” to Denbury’s Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of Its
    “Plugged and Abandoned” and “Due Diligence” No Evidence Motions for
    Summary Judgment (image number 62463544);
    4.         Exhibit “D” to Denbury’s Consolidated Reply Memorandum in Support of Its
    “Plugged and Abandoned” and “Due Diligence” No Evidence Motions for
    Summary Judgment (image number 62463545); and
    5.         This correspondence.
    ENERGY CENTRE $ 1100 POYDRAS ST.$ SUITE 3100 $ NEW ORLEANS, LA 7016 3
    TELEPHONE (504) 585-3800 $ FACSIMILE (504) 585-3801
    Ms. Phyllis Washington
    July 6, 2015                                                             CARVER, DARDEN,
    Page 2                                                                KORETZKY, TESSIER, FINN,
    BLOSSMAN & AREAUX LLC
    Please prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing these
    omitted items. The parties have completed their briefing, with Denbury’s Reply Brief being filed
    today. Please expedite this request to ensure the Appellate Court has a full and complete record
    for its determination. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to
    contact me directly. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
    Sincerely,
    Sarah E. Stogner
    SES/daj
    cc:       14th Circuit Court of Appeals
    4845-0013-4437, v. 1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00041-CV

Filed Date: 7/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016