Luis A. Santiago and Linda A. Santiago v. the Bank of New York Mellon, Ocwen Financial Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 18, 2015
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-15-00342-CV
    LUIS A. SANTIAGO AND LINDA A. SANTIAGO, Appellants
    V.
    THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
    OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
    AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, Appellees
    On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 296-02073-2011
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart
    Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
    Appellants appeal the trial court’s December 1, 2014 order granting a motion to clarify
    the parties’ agreed order staying enforcement of the judgment. Appellants filed their notice of
    appeal on March 13, 2015. In a letter dated April 9, 2015, we questioned our jurisdiction over
    this appeal and instructed appellants to file a jurisdictional brief and gave appellees an
    opportunity to respond.
    Appellants timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, and filed
    their notice of appeal fifty-seven days after the order was signed. Generally, a notice of appeal
    must be filed within thirty days of the appealed order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A timely
    request for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure
    296, however, will extend the time to file a notice of appeal to ninety days if findings of fact and
    conclusions of law either are required by the Rules of Civil Procedure or, if not required, could
    properly be considered by the appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(4). Appellees contend
    the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law here did not extend the appellants’
    deadline. We agree.
    Rule 296 does not apply to post-judgment hearings. See Johnson v. J.W. Construction
    Co., 
    717 S.W.2d 464
    , 467-68 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ). Appellants made the
    request for findings of fact and conclusions of law following a trial court’s order on a post-
    judgment motion. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not relevant in this context. See
    
    id. For this
    reason, the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law did not extend the
    time for filing a notice of appeal, and the notice of appeal is untimely.
    The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b).
    Because the notice of appeal here was filed late, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    150342F.P05
    /Carolyn Wright/
    CAROLYN WRIGHT
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    LUIS A. SANTIAGO AND                              On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District
    LINDA A. SANTIAGO, Appellants                     Court, Collin County, Texas.
    Trial Court Cause No. 296-02073-2011.
    No. 05-15-00342-CV       V.                       Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
    Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart,
    THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,                      participating.
    OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
    OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AND
    MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
    REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, Appellees
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
    It is ORDERED that appellees THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, OCWEN
    FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AND MORTGAGE
    ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants
    LUIS A. SANTIAGO AND LINDA A. SANTIAGO.
    Judgment entered May 18, 2015.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-15-00342-CV

Filed Date: 5/18/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016